STM32CubeMX (MCUs)

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Forum Posts

STM32CubeMX 6.13.0 released

We are pleased to announce to you that the release 6.13.0 of STM32CubeMX is available. What is new in 6.13.0: Added support for the following series, microcontrollers and microprocessors: STM32N6, STM32U3, STM32WL3x, STM32G411xx and STM32C0Added the ...

I2C Feature Request: Please don't hardcode OwnAddress.

Hi All,In a hardware architecture where there are multiple I2C slaves running the same code base, each slave must determine their own address. The code generated by Stm32Cube hard codes the OwnAddress so it is impossible to insert a unique address in...

DOsbo by Senior
  • 281 Views
  • 0 replies
  • 0 kudos

Resolved! Bug for generate with SUBG2 ( Middleware )

Dear ST; I found bug for generate with SUBG2. I can export file to STM32CubeIDE but it can't be use with other MCU .This photo. I can generate with STM32L010.This photo. I compile source code. I found error in middleware from ST.Thank you,Best re...

0693W000007E3CLQA0.jpg 0693W000007E3CkQAK.jpg
Gz by Senior
  • 1122 Views
  • 7 replies
  • 0 kudos

Resolved! Adding User Label in CubeMX, and regenerating code, CubeIDE doesn't add appropriate #define resulting in undeclared errors. Is this the design behavior?

Shouldn't CubeMX 6.01 create the #defines that coorespond to newly added User Labels in an existing project ? Of course it works if I add the User Labels as #defines manually. If this is the expected design behavior, please let me know...Thanks,Heath...

HGran.1 by Associate II
  • 1328 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 kudos