STM32CubeIDE (MCUs)

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Forum Posts

STM32CubeIDE 1.17.0 released

We are pleased to announce to you that the release 1.17.0 of STM32CubeIDE is available. What is new in 1.17.0: Microcontrollers, microprocessors, and board lists aligned with STM32CubeMX: Added the support for the STM32N6 seriesAdded the support for ...

Resolved! How to open an existing project

Hello, I would like to open an existing project : But when I select .'project' I have this picture and I can't see the code : Do you know how to do ? Thank you for your helps Regards

0693W00000NsEjyQAF.png 0693W00000NsEk3QAF.png
DYann.1 by Senior II
  • 6736 Views
  • 6 replies
  • 0 kudos

Resolved! Indexer problem in STM32CUDEIDE 1.8 and 1.9

Hello dear friends,I have installed STM32CUBEIDE v1.7, v1.8 and v1.9. Since V1.8 the indexer can't find variables and functions in cube-generated files and throw this type of message."Could not find symbol 'blah blah' in index".This issue is really a...

I am working with CubeIDE 1.7.0 . I was to move my project on latest 1.9.0 version, but this version of CubeIDE is give me 500 errors . Do you know where I can download CubeIDE 1.3.1 again ?

stm32 cubeide 1.9.0 version gcc 10 compiler give me error in structures files but in 1.7.0 version of software gcc 9 all ok with structure.maximum error cover with the help of extern before variables and function but only problem in structure defini...

SKapa.1 by Associate II
  • 844 Views
  • 5 replies
  • 0 kudos

as we discussion we move stmcubeide32 1.7.0 version to stmcubeide32 1.7.0 we are solve the multiple error resolve with the help of "extern" but some error reaming regarding structure declaration give some error in gcc 10 not resolve

1.sturcture declaration we have facing some errors in the GCC 10 in terms of the variables and function we use "extern: solve the error 2.But in terms of structure how we resolve the errors please look the issue and give me some solutions .

SKapa.1 by Associate II
  • 661 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 kudos