STM32CubeIDE (MCUs)

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Forum Posts

STM32CubeIDE 1.18.1 released

We are pleased to announce that the minor release 1.18.1 of STM32CubeIDE is available. What is new in 1.18.1: This minor release will not bring any major updates to the STM32CubeIDE 1.18.1. It will be aligned with the STM32CubeMX 6.14.1. Main fixed i...

STM32CubeIDE 1.18.0 released

We are pleased to announce that the release 1.18.0 of STM32CubeIDE is available. What is new in 1.18.0: Microcontrollers, microprocessors, and board lists aligned with STM32CubeMX 6.14.0: Added the support for STM32WBA6xxx microcontrollers in the STM...

Resolved! Yet another "Failed to execute MI command" problem...

Hi guysThis project here was built and debugged fine last week. Today, I get this message:'Launching has encounteres a problem. Error in final launch sequence: Failed to execute MI command: -environment-cd <Path/to/project> Error message from debu...

err msg.png
White_Fox by Associate III
  • 2799 Views
  • 5 replies
  • 3 kudos

formula for pwm generation

hi im using stm32g474vet6 mcu, i want generate centrealigned mode pwm of 5khzhow to generate 5khz pwm in centre aligned mode, how to calculate the ARR value for 5khz, since my timer1 clk is 170mhz im not doing any prescalar.can some share the formula...

Resolved! Cube IDE latest update Bug

There is a bug in the new cube ide version in the lwip vonfiguration for the STM32F7 LWIP_RAM_HEAP_POINTER (RAM Heap Pointer) 0x30004000There is no such RAM location in the STM32F7. the correct value should be zero but better u guys check it. by the ...

msalem88 by Associate II
  • 1175 Views
  • 7 replies
  • 2 kudos

Code generation error with NUCLEO-F103RB

I am working on the blink led project on the Nucleo - F103RB, I facing error during the code generation process, the code isn't generating. Might be something with macbook, that i need to install any extra packages or something.Can someone plzz help ...

divraj by Associate
  • 227 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 kudos

Resolved! gcc int comparison undefined behavior

I found a different behavior, with or without optimization, that I can't explain me.In the code snippet  below, the value b is 0 if you compile without optimization and 1 with optimization enabled (-O1) (gcc ver 12.3.rev1).The only apparent differenc...