STM32 MCUs Security

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Forum Posts

Reducing SBSFU binary size

My user application firmware is rather big. It runs on STM32G070, so I've adapted the example code from STM32G071. I've followed the example provided in AN5056 (see picture) to reduce the SBSFU size, it saved about 10 kB, but it is not enough (still ...

0693W00000FCWxTQAX.png
leeana by Associate III
  • 972 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 kudos

Resolved! STM32L5 secure access to non-secure flash block read as zero. Is it an architecturally specified behavior or just an MCU specific behavior?

I am currently experimenting on stm32l562e-dk board, and I discovered that, in the secure world, non-secure flash cannot be read via a secure memory region (i.e. not covered by any of the SAU regions). To be specific, value of zero is read.I am wond...

WChoi.4 by Associate
  • 667 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 kudos

Huge user application binary file

Hello everyoneSo I've managed to build MY user app, where a lot of things programmed alongside sbsfu support.But the binary file is simply huge - 134 MB! How comes?Also, sfb file does not get generated. May it be connected to disabled security define...

leeana by Associate III
  • 500 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 kudos

Resolved! STM32L496 header missing Hash peripheral definitions

It looks like STM32L496xx.h does not have the hash peripheral definitions in it. e.g. The STM32Cube_FW_L4_V1.16.0 examples for STM32L496 HASH peripheral are all configured to use the STM32L4A6xx. Does ST have a plan to update STM32L496xx.h?, or Is...

jrgert by Associate III
  • 967 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 kudos