Interface and connectivity ICs

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Forum Posts

BlueNRG BLE stack port

Posted on May 11, 2018 at 07:37Is it possible to use BlurNRG BLE stack in STM32F103 CPU and use UART as a HCI interface to any Bluetooth chip?Read through BlueNRG manuals and those looks like BlueNRG is ment to be used only in SoC and ACI layer betw...

S2-LP AFC Usage

Posted on May 12, 2018 at 19:10Hi All,I'm evaluating the the S2-LP transceiver at 868 MHz using the Nucleo expansion board and the S2-LP DK software.I need a clarification about the automatic frequency correction: as far as I understood from the dat...

SPWF04: Way to automatic output received data from socket client

Posted on May 12, 2018 at 10:29Hey,the SPWF01 module automatic writes the received data from a tcp socket client. Is there a way to have this in the SPWF04 module?If not, how can I read the data?Module Output                                         ...

SPWF04S Firmware 1.1.0

Posted on September 28, 2017 at 04:06Hello,I was planning to use the SPWF04S module in a product where all the processing is done in the stm32F439 embedded in the module. It seems like the only way to load an application code is to go through the uP...

STM32F407xx with BlueNRG-1 connecting problem

Posted on April 23, 2018 at 11:20Hello everyone! I'm currently working with STM32F407xx application and trying to connect it to BlueNRG-1 via SPI.All that I have are RESETN and SPI MISO, MOSI, CLK and CS pins connected to bluetooth module. I'm tried...

Lenoe by Associate II
  • 578 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 kudos

Resolved! Why I receive unreliable SCAN_RSP data?

Posted on May 10, 2018 at 14:35Hi,My device is Bluetooth LE peripheral that is based on BlueNRG-2 and STM32 connected via SPI.I would like to present some measurement data in SCAN_RSP to central devices.The measurement is performed every 1 second an...

Resolved! SPWF01 recommended for new designs?

Posted on June 08, 2017 at 18:19Hi Jerry,is the SPWF01 recommended for new designs? Do you have planned any firmware updates for future?Since the SPWF01 will not support IPv6, but the SPWF04 do, I don't see any reason to use the SPWF01 in the future...