cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Inconsistency in WWDG_CFR description for STM32G0xx and STM32C0xx

Andreas Bolsch
Lead II

RM0444 rev. 5, sec. 29.3.4 and RM0490 rev. 3, sec. 21.3.4 both employ only WDGTB[1:0], but WWDG_CFR description mentions WDGTB[2:0] with eight different prescaler settings. So actually two or three bits?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Peter BENSCH
ST Employee

Thank you for bringing this to our attention!

That indeed looks like a copy'n'paste typo. In fact, the time base of the WWDG has been extended compared to previous implementations and has three bits. The text strings WDGTB[1:0] still to be found in these RM should therefore be read as WDGTB[2:0].

Regards

/Peter

@Imen DAHMEN​ 

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
Peter BENSCH
ST Employee

Thank you for bringing this to our attention!

That indeed looks like a copy'n'paste typo. In fact, the time base of the WWDG has been extended compared to previous implementations and has three bits. The text strings WDGTB[1:0] still to be found in these RM should therefore be read as WDGTB[2:0].

Regards

/Peter

@Imen DAHMEN​ 

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
Imen.D
ST Employee

Hello All,

Thank you for rising this up.

Internal ticket (ID 154205) is submitted to correct the typos in RM0444 and RM0490.

(PS: ID 154205 is an internal tracking number and is not accessible or usable by customers).

Imen

When your question is answered, please close this topic by clicking "Accept as Solution".
Thanks
Imen