cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

STM32G474RE FDCAN0 Transmit Errors & Passive Mode without CAN Master or Analyzer

omkarprayag
Associate II

Hello Community,

I'm using an STM32G474RE MCU with FDCAN0 to set up CANopen communication for a sensor node device. The setup is designed to cascade multiple sensor devices on the same CAN bus, each with a unique node ID, so they can transmit data independently.

Currently, I have two devices connected in a simple cascading configuration, both operating as CANopen nodes with different IDs. No CAN master or analyzer is connected, as these sensor nodes are meant to operate autonomously on the bus.

Here is my FDCAN initialization code:

 

 

 

void MX_FDCAN1_Init(void)
{
    FDCAN_FilterTypeDef sFilterConfig;
    
    /* FDCAN1 parameter configuration */
    hfdcan1.Instance = FDCAN1;
    hfdcan1.Init.DataPrescaler = 12; 
    hfdcan1.Init.NominalPrescaler = 12; 
    hfdcan1.Init.NominalTimeSeg1 = 13; 
    hfdcan1.Init.DataTimeSeg1 = 13;
    hfdcan1.Init.ClockDivider = FDCAN_CLOCK_DIV1;
    hfdcan1.Init.FrameFormat = FDCAN_FRAME_CLASSIC;
    hfdcan1.Init.Mode = FDCAN_MODE_NORMAL;
    hfdcan1.Init.AutoRetransmission = ENABLE;
    hfdcan1.Init.TransmitPause = DISABLE;
    hfdcan1.Init.ProtocolException = ENABLE;
    hfdcan1.Init.NominalSyncJumpWidth = 1;
    hfdcan1.Init.NominalTimeSeg2 = 2;
    hfdcan1.Init.DataSyncJumpWidth = 1;
    hfdcan1.Init.DataTimeSeg2 = 2;
    hfdcan1.Init.StdFiltersNbr = 0;
    hfdcan1.Init.ExtFiltersNbr = 0;
    hfdcan1.Init.TxFifoQueueMode = FDCAN_TX_FIFO_OPERATION;
    
    if (HAL_FDCAN_Init(&hfdcan1) != HAL_OK)
    {
        Error_Handler();
    }

    /* Configure Rx filter */
    sFilterConfig.IdType = FDCAN_STANDARD_ID;
    sFilterConfig.FilterIndex = 0;
    sFilterConfig.FilterType = FDCAN_FILTER_MASK;
    sFilterConfig.FilterConfig = FDCAN_FILTER_TO_RXFIFO0;
    sFilterConfig.FilterID1 = 0x0000;
    sFilterConfig.FilterID2 = 0x0000;
    
    if (HAL_FDCAN_ConfigFilter(&hfdcan1, &sFilterConfig) != HAL_OK)
    {
        DebugPrint("Failed to config filter.");
    }

    /* Configure global filter to accept all frames */
    if (HAL_FDCAN_ConfigGlobalFilter(&hfdcan1, FDCAN_ACCEPT_IN_RX_FIFO0, FDCAN_ACCEPT_IN_RX_FIFO0, FDCAN_FILTER_REMOTE, FDCAN_FILTER_REMOTE) != HAL_OK)
    {
        DebugPrint("Failed to config global filter.");
    }

    /* Clearing Error Flags */
    __HAL_FDCAN_CLEAR_FLAG(&hfdcan1, FDCAN_FLAG_ERROR_PASSIVE | FDCAN_FLAG_BUS_OFF);

    /* Start the FDCAN module */
    if (HAL_FDCAN_Start(&hfdcan1) != HAL_OK)
    {
        DebugPrint("Failed to start FDCAN.");
    }

    if (HAL_FDCAN_ActivateNotification(&hfdcan1, FDCAN_IT_RX_FIFO0_NEW_MESSAGE | FDCAN_IT_ERROR_PASSIVE | FDCAN_IT_BUS_OFF, 0) != HAL_OK)
    {
        DebugPrint("Failed to activate notifications.");
    }
}

 

 

 

 

The Issue

With the two sensor nodes connected, the bus doesn’t transition to an Active mode, as expected. Instead, it enters an Error Passive state, and the Transmit Error Counter (TEC) reaches 128. This seems to imply a problem with message transmission or bus communication even though both nodes have unique IDs.

 

Questions for the Community

  1. Given that both devices are sensor nodes on CANopen, should they need a master or analyzer to activate the bus, or should the nodes be able to communicate autonomously?
  2. Are there any additional configurations to ensure the devices move to an Active state and avoid the passive error mode?
  3. Is manually initiating communication via an NMT (Network Management) Start command necessary, or should each node operate independently on the bus?

Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!

10 REPLIES 10
SofLit
ST Employee

Hello,

Forget about CANOpen for the moment and establish a simple CAN communication (create a simple CAN project where two nodes are communicating together) and tell what do you find.

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on "Accept as Solution" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

Hi @SofLit, Thank you for the reply.

I followed your suggestion and set up a simple CAN communication project with two nodes, bypassing CANopen, Unfortunately, I’m still encountering the same issue. Both nodes are entering Error Passive mode, and the Transmit Error Counter (TEC) reaches 128, which suggests there's an issue with message transmission or bus communication.

I’ve checked the wiring, including the termination resistors, and verified the CAN parameters. The issue persists, and no meaningful communication appears to be taking place.

Would you recommend further debugging steps, or do you think the problem might lie in the configuration of the CAN timing or another aspect of the physical layer?

Thanks for your help!

Hello,

At this stage I recommend to:

1- Share your schematics and mainly CAN part of the two nodes?

2- Share your code (I prefer the complete simple project). If there is an ioc file please attach it.

 

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on "Accept as Solution" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
Andrew Neil
Evangelist III

@omkarprayag wrote:

With the two sensor nodes connected, the bus doesn’t transition to an Active mode, as expected. !


What about with just one node?

Hi @Andrew Neil ,

Thank you for your response.

On one of the nodes, the behavior is as expected. When no device is connected, it remains in Passive mode. However, when a CAN analyzer or master is connected, the node transitions to Active mode.

SofLit
ST Employee

Just to clarify something: if you are using CAN in Normal mode and you are not connecting any other node on the Bus (establishing a CAN bus), this will never work and the acknowledgement mechanism is broken.

So please confirm you are doing a test with at least two nodes that are connected on the CAN bus.

Note: CAN analyzer is supposed to be the second node connected on the bus that's why you are not seeing an issue.

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on "Accept as Solution" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

@SofLit ,
Yes, I am testing with two CAN nodes, both sensor nodes, and no CAN analyzer is connected to the bus. It is only in this setup that I am encountering the issue.

However, when I connect a CAN analyzer as one of the nodes, along with the sensor node, the issue does not occur.

Could you please give more details about the bus and what sensors are connected to? I prefer to draw a sketch with the different nodes with the CAN bus.

And:

1- Share your schematics and mainly CAN part of the two nodes?

2- Share your code (I prefer the complete simple project). If there is an ioc file please attach it.

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on "Accept as Solution" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

@SofLit , Attached is the connection diagram and schematics of the same