About pretoriandave

pretoriandave · 2025-03-15

Hi All,I have previously experiemented with USB HID mouse coding on STM32F0 series and got code working very quickly.However, I am now trying to get the same going using USBX on STM32C0. My application has been built in MX but wouldn't enumerate. I a...

pretoriandave · 2025-02-28

Hi All,I upgraded from 1.13.2 to 1.17.0 this week and have created one new project since, in the same workspace as all the ones I have created using the old version. For reasons I won't bore you with I needed to do a re-install of the software today,...

pretoriandave · 2025-02-24

Hi All,I know the dreaded 'Failed to load MI command' error has been much discussed on the forum but I can't find any posts which match this set of circumstances, so hoping somebody can help.My project was working perfectly on STM32G0 but I need to p...

pretoriandave · 2024-10-08

While implementing EEPROM emulation on an STM32G0 (although I believe this would apply to all supported families) I have discovered what I believe to be a bug in eeprom_emul.c:Although ConfigureCrc() is called at the beginning of EE_Init to turn on t...

pretoriandave · 2024-09-11

A while ago a member of ST staff kindly helped me on this forum with adding EEPROM emulation to my design (at the time based on Nucleo-F401RE) by directing me to here....https://github.com/STMicroelectronics/STM32CubeF4/tree/master/Projects/STM32F4-D...

pretoriandave · 2025-02-25

@Pavel A. yes I came to the same conclusion. Not on Win 11 unfortunately.Is this anything to go by?....It keeps popping up so I think it may be. Thanks

pretoriandave · 2025-02-24

Thanks @Pavel A. How does one go about that? I tried cleaning the project but it made no difference. Thanks

pretoriandave · 2024-10-14

Thanks @mƎALLEm, got it. Please can I suggest that this is clarified in the AN and the header reworded. The meaning of 'very first time' is misaleading as you have said and would benefit from being reworded. Thanks

pretoriandave · 2024-10-14

@Andrew Neil Yes that's correct. AN4061 is the old method and could use arbitrary addresses. The new method requires them to be consecutive beginning at 1.

pretoriandave · 2024-10-14

Many thanks @mƎALLEm , great service as ever. I think there may be an important distinction in here that we should bottom out, as I think it might warrant a tweak to AN4898 and/or the headers in eeprom_emul.c as they seem to be at odds...I think what...

User statistics

User Activity

USBX on STM32C0 incomplete?

Can't import a project

Failed to execute MI command after update to IDE

X-CUBE-EEPROM 7.0.0 bug

EEPROM Emulation

Re: Failed to execute MI command after update to IDE

Re: Failed to execute MI command after update to IDE

Re: X-CUBE-EEPROM 7.0.0 bug

Re: X-CUBE-EEPROM 7.0.0 bug

Re: X-CUBE-EEPROM 7.0.0 bug