cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

BOR level description is confusing

FArdi.1
Associate III

Using latest STM32CubeProgrammer v2.15.0

Register name and description don't match (rising register, but falling description, and vice versa).

Which one is correct?

FArdi1_0-1707879998225.png

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
TDK
Guru

Rising voltage is higher than falling voltage. Description on the left is correct.

The reference manual is the best reference source.

TDK_0-1707881825148.png

 

 

See this post, STM32CubeProgrammer might be writing them to the wrong locations anyway. Unclear.

https://community.st.com/t5/stm32cubeprogrammer-mcus/stm32cubeprogrammer-2-10-0-released/m-p/134440/highlight/true#M1675

 

If you feel a post has answered your question, please click "Accept as Solution".

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4
TDK
Guru

Rising voltage is higher than falling voltage. Description on the left is correct.

The reference manual is the best reference source.

TDK_0-1707881825148.png

 

 

See this post, STM32CubeProgrammer might be writing them to the wrong locations anyway. Unclear.

https://community.st.com/t5/stm32cubeprogrammer-mcus/stm32cubeprogrammer-2-10-0-released/m-p/134440/highlight/true#M1675

 

If you feel a post has answered your question, please click "Accept as Solution".
FArdi.1
Associate III

@TDK 

Thanks for the answer & the link to old issue.

At least for now the address location is correct for -ob BOR_EN=0x1 BORF_LEV=0x3 BORR_LEV=0x0

Only descriptions inside GUI need to be swapped.

FArdi1_0-1707891505342.png

FArdi1_1-1707891585986.png

 

 

Thanks for figuring that out and posting the result.

If you feel a post has answered your question, please click "Accept as Solution".
FArdi.1
Associate III

Description is unchanged with new v2.16.0. Still wrong, not match with Reference Manual.

But the release history said otherwise. See attached.