HAL_SYSTICK_IRQHandler() call is missing in CubeMX v5 generated Systick_Handler.

[Innomatic]

When STM32CubeMX v.5 generates project, it does not insert HAL_SYSTICK_IRQHander() inside SysTick_Handler(). As a result, your HAL_SYSTICK_Callback() no longer works. Previous versions of CubeMX used to generate following code for SysTick_Handler()

/**
* @brief This function handles System tick timer.
*/
void SysTick_Handler(void)
{
  /* USER CODE BEGIN SysTick_IRQn 0 */
 
  /* USER CODE END SysTick_IRQn 0 */
  HAL_IncTick();
  HAL_SYSTICK_IRQHandler();
  /* USER CODE BEGIN SysTick_IRQn 1 */
 
  /* USER CODE END SysTick_IRQn 1 */
}

In version 5. it becomes

/**
* @brief This function handles System tick timer.
*/
void SysTick_Handler(void)
{
  /* USER CODE BEGIN SysTick_IRQn 0 */
 
  /* USER CODE END SysTick_IRQn 0 */
  HAL_IncTick();
  /* USER CODE BEGIN SysTick_IRQn 1 */
 
  /* USER CODE END SysTick_IRQn 1 */
}

[JGawe]

Hi, I have a similar problem. I used HAL_SYSTICK_IRQHandler () to increment my own timer software to count the duration of the event on the GPIO microcontroller.

Now, instead of using HAL_SYSTICK_IRQHandler(), do I set up a hardware Timer and use it to count the duration? Or can I getting the value from the system variable 'uwTick' which is incremented in HAL_IncTick () - is checking the value of 'uwTick' is ugly? and not suitable for the final release solution ??

[GS1]

Hello,

actually you can still call HAL_SYSTICK_IRQHandler(), but you have to place the call in the "USER" area by yourself.

[CVeld]

Dear Nawres,

I really hope you made a mistake in claiming "the HAL_SYSTICK_IRQHandler is used for debug purpose", because we are getting in real large problems with many of our software applications. Please solve this what we experience as a serious bug/misunderstanding.

Thank you in advance for your understanding and your help.

Kind regards,

Carlo

[CVeld]

Dear Nawres,

The following text is quoted from your user manual:

"System timer

The system timer, SysTick, is a 24-bit count-down timer. Use this as a Real Time

Operating System (RTOS) tick timer or as a simple counter."

See document: PM0056 Programming manual, DocID15491 Rev 6, page 12.

And I can not find any 'Cube coding rules' or any other statement in the documentation that says otherwise.

Kind regards,

Carlo

[Tesla DeLorean]

That's chip level programming document.

The HAL examples don't use HAL_SYSTICK_IRQHandler();

More importantly, the thing everyone seems to miss is the chronic issues and dead locks that will result from callback functions trying to use all kinds of other HAL sub-functions which have dependencies on the ticker and timeouts, and that callbacks occur under interrupt context, and the processor can't preempt an interrrupt it is already in.

[Tesla DeLorean]

No, not a bug.

The bug is everyone putting random crap in the callbacks which have run-times >1ms, blocking, or otherwise having a circular dependency on the 1ms(1KHz) ticker incrementing. So basically a whole class of dead-lock and priority inversion type issues. For the mechanics of other parts of the HAL to work the SysTick must have the highest priority and preempt all other IRQ.

[Tesla DeLorean]

I'd guess it is this

https://www.st.com/content/ccc/resource/technical/document/user_manual/10/c5/1a/43/3a/70/43/7d/DM00104712.pdf/files/DM00104712.pdf/jcr:content/translations/en.DM00104712.pdf

https://www.st.com/content/ccc/resource/technical/document/user_manual/group0/d6/4c/20/0d/a1/c1/4c/99/DM00210526/files/DM00210526.pdf/jcr:content/translations/en.DM00210526.pdf

[GS1]

Sorry, but if you open first document on Page 102/327 of UM1718 Rev 2 the document tells us:

Example of configuration using SysTick without FreeRTOS:

void SysTick_Handler(void)

{

/* USER CODE BEGIN SysTick_IRQn 0 */

/* USER CODE END SysTick_IRQn 0 */

HAL_IncTick();

HAL_SYSTICK_IRQHandler();

/* USER CODE BEGIN SysTick_IRQn 1 */

/* USER CODE END SysTick_IRQn 1 */

}

But when code is created with Cube V. 5.0, HAL_SYSTICK_IRQHandler(); is missing! Thats the problem! With previous versions of Cube the call was created automatically.

[Marcelo Barros]

I found some more missing points:

1) In *msp.c we do not have anymore the priority setting for SYSTICK. However, Cube allows you to modify the SYSTICK priority. So where is it located ?

2) During clock initialization, we do not have anymore any call to SYSTICK functions like HAL_SYSTICK_Config() or HAL_SYSTICK_CLKSourceConfig().

Reading the documentation, it is stated that "SysTick_Handler not generated in the code when FreeRTOSTM is enabled" but my project does not have FreeRTOS and all Systick related items are missing.

In my opinion, SYSTICK is a valuable resource and should be made available for developers as before. We use it for many tick based applications.

[Lionel1]

Hi,

Same for me. When I passed my code with this new version of CubeMX, nothing work.

I spent several hours to find that the problem is the missing "HAL_SYSTICK_IRQHandler();" line >:(

Hopefully I found this post of Innomatic :)