STM32G474RE FDCAN0 Transmit Errors & Passive Mode without CAN Master or Analyzer

[omkarprayag]

Hello Community,

I'm using an STM32G474RE MCU with FDCAN0 to set up CANopen communication for a sensor node device. The setup is designed to cascade multiple sensor devices on the same CAN bus, each with a unique node ID, so they can transmit data independently.

Currently, I have two devices connected in a simple cascading configuration, both operating as CANopen nodes with different IDs. No CAN master or analyzer is connected, as these sensor nodes are meant to operate autonomously on the bus.

Here is my FDCAN initialization code:

void MX_FDCAN1_Init(void)
{
    FDCAN_FilterTypeDef sFilterConfig;
    
    /* FDCAN1 parameter configuration */
    hfdcan1.Instance = FDCAN1;
    hfdcan1.Init.DataPrescaler = 12; 
    hfdcan1.Init.NominalPrescaler = 12; 
    hfdcan1.Init.NominalTimeSeg1 = 13; 
    hfdcan1.Init.DataTimeSeg1 = 13;
    hfdcan1.Init.ClockDivider = FDCAN_CLOCK_DIV1;
    hfdcan1.Init.FrameFormat = FDCAN_FRAME_CLASSIC;
    hfdcan1.Init.Mode = FDCAN_MODE_NORMAL;
    hfdcan1.Init.AutoRetransmission = ENABLE;
    hfdcan1.Init.TransmitPause = DISABLE;
    hfdcan1.Init.ProtocolException = ENABLE;
    hfdcan1.Init.NominalSyncJumpWidth = 1;
    hfdcan1.Init.NominalTimeSeg2 = 2;
    hfdcan1.Init.DataSyncJumpWidth = 1;
    hfdcan1.Init.DataTimeSeg2 = 2;
    hfdcan1.Init.StdFiltersNbr = 0;
    hfdcan1.Init.ExtFiltersNbr = 0;
    hfdcan1.Init.TxFifoQueueMode = FDCAN_TX_FIFO_OPERATION;
    
    if (HAL_FDCAN_Init(&hfdcan1) != HAL_OK)
    {
        Error_Handler();
    }

    /* Configure Rx filter */
    sFilterConfig.IdType = FDCAN_STANDARD_ID;
    sFilterConfig.FilterIndex = 0;
    sFilterConfig.FilterType = FDCAN_FILTER_MASK;
    sFilterConfig.FilterConfig = FDCAN_FILTER_TO_RXFIFO0;
    sFilterConfig.FilterID1 = 0x0000;
    sFilterConfig.FilterID2 = 0x0000;
    
    if (HAL_FDCAN_ConfigFilter(&hfdcan1, &sFilterConfig) != HAL_OK)
    {
        DebugPrint("Failed to config filter.");
    }

    /* Configure global filter to accept all frames */
    if (HAL_FDCAN_ConfigGlobalFilter(&hfdcan1, FDCAN_ACCEPT_IN_RX_FIFO0, FDCAN_ACCEPT_IN_RX_FIFO0, FDCAN_FILTER_REMOTE, FDCAN_FILTER_REMOTE) != HAL_OK)
    {
        DebugPrint("Failed to config global filter.");
    }

    /* Clearing Error Flags */
    __HAL_FDCAN_CLEAR_FLAG(&hfdcan1, FDCAN_FLAG_ERROR_PASSIVE | FDCAN_FLAG_BUS_OFF);

    /* Start the FDCAN module */
    if (HAL_FDCAN_Start(&hfdcan1) != HAL_OK)
    {
        DebugPrint("Failed to start FDCAN.");
    }

    if (HAL_FDCAN_ActivateNotification(&hfdcan1, FDCAN_IT_RX_FIFO0_NEW_MESSAGE | FDCAN_IT_ERROR_PASSIVE | FDCAN_IT_BUS_OFF, 0) != HAL_OK)
    {
        DebugPrint("Failed to activate notifications.");
    }
}

The Issue

With the two sensor nodes connected, the bus doesn’t transition to an Active mode, as expected. Instead, it enters an Error Passive state, and the Transmit Error Counter (TEC) reaches 128. This seems to imply a problem with message transmission or bus communication even though both nodes have unique IDs.

 

Questions for the Community

1. Given that both devices are sensor nodes on CANopen, should they need a master or analyzer to activate the bus, or should the nodes be able to communicate autonomously?
2. Are there any additional configurations to ensure the devices move to an Active state and avoid the passive error mode?
3. Is manually initiating communication via an NMT (Network Management) Start command necessary, or should each node operate independently on the bus?

Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!

[SofLit]

Thank you for the sharing.

1- How about the two terminating resistors on both sides of the bus 120ohm each? I don't see it in the shared schematics.

2- What about CAN_nSTB status?:

3- As I understood from your sketch the two nodes are composed of STM32G474, am I right?

4- Again please share your simple code you used for the test to prevent many useless ping pongs.

Thank you.