Hi,
I am designing a system that will be using an STM32F411 microcontroller as the hardware application processor, the system will also have onboard a Single board computer module running Linux. While the application processor will take care of the majority of the hardware interface because of the realtime nature of the application, the SBC will be hosting the user interface, provide logging services, network access as well as management/supervisory functions, this is I think a fairly typical system for a real-time control architecture.
The SBC I am using is a plug in compute module, this is a read-made plug and play system that runs Linux, my application board provides the power and other ancillary interface hardware.
I am in the design phase, and I have a question about programming the STM32 micro. On the bench, and even on the board in the field I intend to have the four ping SWD interface the for common low cost STLink programmers. However, in production use I would like to be able to take over-the-wire firmware updates, so the obvious approach here is to have the SBC look for the updates, and when available and appropriate to do so, should be able to flash the firmware directly onto the STM32 microcontroller.
I would rather not design in another processer and embed and STLink (like the Nucleo boards do), so I am wondering what the simplest and best option would be to allow the SBC to flash the STM32. I understand that the STM32 has a boot loader built into the micro, and that I can force a reset and control the boot pins to put that boot loader into different modes.
I only have basic STM32 knowledge, so I am just looking for general block-diagram level guidance here. I have SPI, I2C, USB 2.0 and UARTS available from the SBC.
To keep it simple, my thinking is, I can connect the the SBC to the UART0 of the STM32 as well as some IO hookup for the STM32 reset and boot pins. I should then be able to restart the STM32 to put the boot loader into flash firmware mode on UART0. Also, when not being used to flash the STM32 I could use the UART interface as the inter-communication between the SBC and STM32, the UART will be more than fast enough for the inter-communications I need.
A second thought is, I could connect the USB interface on the SBC to the USB interface on the STM32, I understand its possible to make the boot loader use he onboard USB interface of the STM32? This would give me the advantage of having a much higher communications througput, but perhaps makes the software job more complicated.
Am I on the right track here? Is there something else/better I should be considering or doing. Appreciate any high-level guidance here.
