Can STM32H747 Disc0 support simultaneously 2 FDCAN's + Display 24bit mode + 3 SPI's + 2 UART + SD card
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2021-01-29 9:36 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2021-02-03 10:39 AM
Hello @Shree24​ ,
Welcome to the STM32 Community :smiling_face_with_smiling_eyes:.
I advise you to review the features of the list of peripherals available on your relevant part number, in the STM32H747xx datasheet, precisely in the "Table 1. STM32H747xI/G features and peripheral counts":
Imen
Thanks
Imen
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2021-02-03 11:19 AM
In principle, this is supported. Poor pin multiplexing, low pincount packages and other constraints may defeat this target. Carefully plan your pinout, e.g. with Cube to not fall into some pitfall.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2021-02-03 11:37 AM
A review of the schematic/manual related to the Arduino PMOD and +STMOD connections should provide some insight. Especially to UART/SPI question.
The video is escaped via 2-lane DSI, not parallel.
Resources on the DISCO and EVAL boards tend to be very tight
Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2021-02-03 9:15 PM
Hello,
Thank you for the reply. From the table we can get number of channels adopted for each peripherals. But I wanted to now whether there will be any conflict on pins while developing application.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2021-02-03 9:21 PM
Hello,
Thank you for the reply. Practically taking into consideration everything, I do feel that it requires correct planning on pinout to match requirement (so that no peripheral pins gets conflict).
