ETH Tx offload documentation typos
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2022-11-30 04:59 AM
As noted by @Community member​ in https://community.st.com/s/question/0D53W00001yEbUsSAK/stm32f7-eth-tcp-checksum-offload-fails :
there's a documentation error in RM0410 which says CIC bits are 28..27 in [TDES1], page 1785
Besides this, CIC bits are not in TDES1 but in TDES0, so that's second typo in the same sentence.
I checked not just RM0410 rev.4, but also RM0090 rev.19, and it contains exactly the same two typos, so it will probably go across all RMs containing the ETH chapter.
JW
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Documentation
-
Ethernet
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2022-12-01 01:58 AM
Hello @Community member​,
Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention.
I confirm this issue in RM0410, RM0090, RM0386, RM0033 and RM0008.
I reported internally.
Internal ticket number: 140321 (This is an internal tracking number and is not accessible or usable by customers).
Kaouthar
To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2022-12-01 01:58 AM
Hello @Community member​,
Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention.
I confirm this issue in RM0410, RM0090, RM0386, RM0033 and RM0008.
I reported internally.
Internal ticket number: 140321 (This is an internal tracking number and is not accessible or usable by customers).
Kaouthar
To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2022-12-01 02:54 AM
Thanks, Kaouthar.
JW
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2022-12-03 06:32 AM
...and RM0385.
Also, will the this report be ignored forever? More than 3 years have passed...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2022-12-06 02:46 AM
Hello @Piranha​,
Thank you.
This issue will be considered in coming revision.
Kaouthar
To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.