cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

LIS3DSH question and documentation request

Posted on March 31, 2017 at 07:49

I've been able to get the LIS3DSH working for single values by doing this:

transmitData[0] = (uint8_t) (LIS3DSH_READ | LIS3DSH_X_L);

SPISend( transmitData, receiveData, 2);

xl = receiveData[1];

But if I wanted to read out multiple values in one transaction, I'd expect that I could do something like:

transmitData[0] = (uint8_t) (LIS3DSH_READ | LIS3DSH_MULTIPLE | LIS3DSH_X_L);

transmitData[1] = (uint8_t) (LIS3DSH_READ | LIS3DSH_X_L);

SPISend( transmitData, receiveData, 3);

xl = receiveData[1];

xh = receiveData[2];

Or have byte 2 just be 0xFF because the auto-increment would do what I expected.

But alas, it doesn't work. (yes address increment is turned on in register 6)

Can this be done? What am I missing?

Now for documentation, the temperature register just isn't documented in the data sheet. It took a while to figure out that it is Celcius and biased by -25C. Also, the M/S bit isn't documented either. I found AN3393 to be very useful, the data sheet, not so much.

Thanks,

Andrei from The Great White North.

5 REPLIES 5
Miroslav BATEK
ST Employee
Posted on March 31, 2017 at 10:33

I assume you are using 4-wire SPI interface, than you approach for multi read operation is correct. But I don't know what exactly you function SPISend does.

It would be good to check the signal with scope or logic analyzer to see if it match with the protocol.

0690X00000606fOQAQ.png
Posted on March 31, 2017 at 16:05

Sorry, yes you are correct, I'm using 4 wire SPI.

My SPISend routine is:

void

SPISend(

uint8_t

* transmit,

uint8_t

* receive,

uint16_t

length) {

HAL_StatusTypeDef

status;

HAL_GPIO_WritePin( CS_I2C_SPI_GPIO_Port, CS_I2C_SPI_Pin,

GPIO_PIN_RESET

);

 

status = HAL_SPI_TransmitReceive( &hspi1, transmit, receive, length, 100);

 

HAL_GPIO_WritePin( CS_I2C_SPI_GPIO_Port, CS_I2C_SPI_Pin,

GPIO_PIN_SET

);

 

if

(status !=

HAL_OK

) {

    

printf

(

''there is a problem with the transmit %d\r\n''

, status);

 

}

}

When I send two characters the pattern is:

0690X00000606fdQAA.png

So the signaling form is okay. At 5.25 MBaud I'm not buzzing the chip. The values that I'm getting out make sense.

I checked the wave forms on the three byte version (read | multiple | xlow, read | xhigh, dummy) and it looked good, nothing violated, but the data did not change.

Andrei

Posted on April 25, 2017 at 16:37

Okay, I figured it out. 

According to the timing diagram in the data sheet, bit 0x80 is the R/W bit, and 0x40 is the M/S bit, with bits 0x3F being the address bits.

In real life, there is no M/S bit. The diagram is a cut/paste from a previous generation of some  other chip. 

To read multiple bytes, you set the address increment bit in control 6 and just keep sending clocks.

If you set the M bit 0x40, suddenly you are just reading other registers. This device has registers in the 0x4x-0x7x range, and you just end up reading them.

So, this snippet works:

for

(

uint8_t

i = 0; i < 7; i++) {

   transmitData[i] = 0 ;

}

transmitData[0] = (

uint8_t

) (LIS3DSH_READ |

 

LIS3DSH_X_L);

SPISend( transmitData, receiveData, 7);

x = (

int16_t

) (receiveData[2] << 8) | (

int16_t

) receiveData[1];

y = (

int16_t

) (receiveData[4] << 8) | (

int16_t

) receiveData[3];

z = (

int16_t

) (receiveData[6] << 8) | (

int16_t

) receiveData[5];

So, ST, please correct your documentation.  The same problem exists in the LSM6DSL documentation, and I expect many more as well.

Andrei from The Great White North

As seen on the embedded.fm podcast and blog.

Posted on April 25, 2017 at 17:23

Okay, in DocID022405 Rev 2, table 15 shows the default values for register 6 being address-increment being off and watermark interrupt being on.

Section 7.7 says nothing about the default for address-increment, but has watermark interrupt being off.

If I do not set the address-increment bit, the address still increments.

I think there is something wrong with the documentation.

Posted on May 30, 2017 at 17:19

I think you are right the Figures 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 in

DocID022405 Rev 2 (Datasheet for LIS3DSH) 

are not correct because the bit 1 is not the M/S but is MSB of the register address. I asked sensor specialists to confirm this and fix the datasheet. 

I don't see this issue in the datasheet for LSM6DSL

Concerning the default value of CTRL_REG6, it is not mentioned in the table 15. I think you mistake the default value with binary representation of the register address. But you are right in the section 7.7 the default value of ADD_INC is not mentioned. This bit is set to 1 by default.

I'm sorry for the inconvenience.