STM32Cube STM32H7 firmware 1.5.0, when fix SDMMC init?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2019-09-12 11:36 AM
Hello, I use STM32CubeMX and use the latest STM32H7 (1.5.0) firmware.
When may the MX_SDMMC1_SD_Init finally be fixed?
The function still looks like this, which will accomplish nothing, really:
void MX_SDMMC1_SD_Init(void)
{
hsd1.Instance = SDMMC1;
hsd1.Init.ClockEdge = SDMMC_CLOCK_EDGE_RISING;
hsd1.Init.ClockPowerSave = SDMMC_CLOCK_POWER_SAVE_DISABLE;
hsd1.Init.BusWide = SDMMC_BUS_WIDE_4B;
hsd1.Init.HardwareFlowControl = SDMMC_HARDWARE_FLOW_CONTROL_DISABLE;
hsd1.Init.ClockDiv = 25;
}
Should it better look something like this, at least calling HAL_SD_Init too, or is it not needed to do so?
void MX_SDMMC1_SD_Init(void)
{
HAL_StatusTypeDef status;
hsd1.Instance = SDMMC1;
hsd1.Init.ClockEdge = SDMMC_CLOCK_EDGE_RISING;
hsd1.Init.ClockPowerSave = SDMMC_CLOCK_POWER_SAVE_DISABLE;
hsd1.Init.BusWide = SDMMC_BUS_WIDE_4B;
hsd1.Init.HardwareFlowControl = SDMMC_HARDWARE_FLOW_CONTROL_DISABLE;
hsd1.Init.ClockDiv = 25;
status = HAL_SD_Init(&hsd1);
if (status != HAL_OK)
{
Error_Handler();
}
}
Has the library for SDMMC been tested using the first code? Does it work that way?
I believe for me only the second variant works.
- Labels:
-
SDIO-SDMMC
-
STM32CubeMX
-
STM32H7 Series
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2019-09-12 11:59 AM
I think it is pretty apparent that ST doesn't have any kind of test matrix for the automated code generation.
Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2019-09-13 10:02 AM
When I compare the different STM32H7 firmware (1.4.0 vs 1.5.0), I notice they focus on correcting preceding and trailing spaces in the source code mostly.
I think to have the code correct is more important. :)
