2012-11-05 02:28 AM
Revision 2 of RM0090 is available.
http://www.st.com/internet/com/TECHNICAL_RESOURCES/TECHNICAL_LITERATURE/REFERENCE_MANUAL/DM00031020.pdf JW2015-11-09 01:35 AM
Hi waclawek.jan,
To answer you question: We just improved the PLL VCO characteristics to output lower frequency 100MHz for more flexibility. But the IDD characteristics remain the same. So, the values provided in datasheets aren't wrong.Thanks again for your interest.-Mayla-To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
2015-11-09 04:19 AM
That didn't translate too well. So did you change the silicon design or process to effect this improvement? Or did you re-characterize the current silicon over a broader range and are now willing to guarantee existing parts will operate at these speeds over temperature?
2016-06-06 10:00 AM
RM0090 rev.12 is out.
(The STM32F405/407 Errata on the webpage is said to be version 7, but version 6 downloads - is that an overlook?) JW2016-07-14 07:43 AM
Hi Jan,
Please note that the issue related to the errata sheet version is fixed. Now you have the available on the web.-Mayla-To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
2016-07-15 03:48 AM
Thanks, Mayla.
Jan2016-10-04 02:14 AM
RM0090 rev.13 is out.
One of the changes is an updated explanation for BUSTURN in FMC_BTR/_BWTR. However, the respective text for BUSTURN in FSMC_BTR/_BWTR did not change. Seriously? JW2017-05-04 01:08 PM
RM0090 rev.14 is out.
2017-07-25 04:45 AM
RM0090 rev.15 is out.
Also the STM32F405/407xx and STM32F415/417xx errata is in a new rev.9.
JW
2018-06-15 06:46 AM
Shortly after rev.16 (Apr.2018) rev.17 (June 2018) is out.
I can't find relevant differences between rev.16 and rev.17 based on the changelog, except for one letter in SAI register description, and adding a new die revision to the list of IDCODEs (my guess is that this relates to the ongoing transfer of all 90nm products from France to TSMC).
Does anybody see any of the advertised differences in the RCC clock trees or the interrupt vector tables?
Thanks,
JW
PS: Spotted this while staring at the vector tables:
2024-05-19 02:15 AM
... and this is still there in Rev.20:
JW