Integration of multiple VL53L0X
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2024-08-05 09:23 PM
Dear ST,
I am looking for a solution with the integration of multiple ToFs such as VL53L0x
Please refer attached image for setup idea
Thanks
- Labels:
-
Ambient light
-
Time of flight
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2024-08-06 07:22 AM
One of the reasons the VL53 sensors work is that the transmit side is so closely coupled to the receiver side. We don't even count on the power 'on' to start the process. The start time is when the VCSEL (laser) starts emitting and some photons hit our reference array. This gives us much better timing.
Another thing to know is that during that 30ms range, there are many, many (call it a million) individual pulses emitted by the sensor.
And then there is the issue of spread-spectrum. If all those pulses were started at a constant frequency, the EMI emitted by the chip would ruin any near-by parts. So, we dither the clock to spread the energy out and avoid a single frequency noise.
Add all that stuff up and basically you cannot do what you propose. Not with this chip anyway. The sensor is just too integrated to be able to take it apart as you suggest.
And, of course, there are no sync pins.
But I do like the concept. But you are going to need something like what is in a commercial Range finder (Bosch makes one). It has a separate VCSEL, VCSEL driver, SPAD (Single Photon Avalanche Diode) array to detect the photons and a separate MCU - TI makes one.
But your biggest challenge is going to be how to synchronize the system. The accuracy of your circuit is going to be the hard bit.
If this or any post solves your issue, please mark them as 'Accept as Solution' It really helps. And if you notice anything wrong do not hesitate to 'Report Inappropriate Content'. Someone will review it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2024-08-07 12:06 PM
Thanks John ,
Please care to help me understand the following
1. The Biggest challenge to synchronize and accuracy would be tricky part to be solved
2. If we follow along the separate parts such as VCSEL and SPAD ( Emission and Reception part) , finding the distance based on only detection
Would be much more trickier than the point 1 itself (as Interference, Reflection, Intensity would come into play , that ST had already solved in a best possible way )
Question:
1. Considering VL53L8CH as reception part, Block the Emission part (Using Opaque/Absorbing material)
While other VL53L8CH as Emission only, and this entire setup is tightly synced
Does every device has unique IR radiation pattern ?
2. Is there a diffraction lens or material upon which ToF sensor measures it , but gives a unique pattern (distinguishable from surrounding)
Thanks