Solved

I installed STM32CubeMX 6.2.0, the STM32CubeH7 1.9.0 and the X-CUBE-AZRTOS-H7 thinking that I would do Azure RTOS projects as I did using FreeRtos. Why didn't ST put Azure RTOS and its components as a midware option? As it does for FreeRtos.How to use the X-CUBE-AZRTOS-H7?

I am looking for NFC and HID card readers, I can't find the chip by surfing on site. I need help from the ST support team in finding the perfect reader for my application.

..

Hello,For a project I am running code on STM32F745VG. I would like to migrate and replace this MCU with a STM32F765VI with more Flash memory (2MB instead of 1MB). I saw that these two MCUs are pin to pin compatible, but do I need to modify my hardware (change resistors or capacitors for example...) ? What are the main differencies that could block the same code from running into the 2 MCUs?Thank you for your time.Regards

i AM TRYING TO INSTALL PLS UDE uising the recommended link: http://spc5.drive.cloudforge.com/projects/spc5tools/updatesbut all i can see is the following message.ForbiddenYou don't have permission to access /projects/spc5tools/updates on this server.SPE 5 ide version 6.0Similarly i am getting the above error.Is some posts it was recommended to use UDE Visual Platform. but i am unable to locate its directory.Do we need to download UDE Visual Platform externally? is it a paid service?

Is there a replacement for stm32f429iit6?

I am currently using a X-NUCLEO-BNRG2A1 to experiment with the BlueNRG-2. I initially set the SPI rate to 1.25 Mbit/s, but later noticed in the BlueNRG-2 documentation that the maximum SPI rate is 1Mbit/s. My question is how strict is this SPI rate limit, and what is the reason for it (hardware limitations, software limitations)? So far, I've run a number of the examples with no noticeable issues at 1.25 Mbit/s. The MCU I am using has a maximum system clock of 80 MHz. Using the SPI prescalers, the highest SPI frequency I can achieve within the 1 Mbit/s limit is 625 KBits/s. I am hesitant to do this because I don't want to potentially limit the bandwidth of the BLE interface. It seems the only way to achieve the 1 Mbit/s rate is to reduce the system clock for the MCU itself (which would affect the entire application). Ideally, if the BlueNRG-2 could run fine at the slightly higher rate of 1.25 MBit/s (as it currently seems to be doing), it would be the best option.

I am currently using the X-NUCLEO-BNRG2A1 to experiment with the BlueNRG-2. Using the getBlueNRGVersion function, I see that the hardware version is 0x12 and the firmware version is 0x2211 and had some questions on how to interpret this:I believe the hardware version represents bluetooth 5.0, but how is the firmware version interpreted? (I found some information in DT0074 that makes me think 0x2211 corresponds to V3.4.1a, but I didn't find any image with that version number on the ST website).The X-NUCLEO-BNRG2A1 is listed as bluetooth 5.0 compliant, while the standalone BlueNRG-2 is listed as bluetooth 5.2 compliant. Is this simply the result of flashing different BLE stack images (since the X-NUCLEO-BNRG2A1 uses a BlueNRG-M2SP which contains a BlueNRG-2)?Does the BlueNRG-2 come preflashed with an image for use as a network coprocessor?Are there compatibility issues between the main application HCI APIs and different versions of the BlueNRG-2 coprocessor images?Where can I find docume

It is very important for a successful developer to use the latest features of the language. Please instruct me how this can be done. Thanks!

hey thereI have the code belowuint32_t startTime = HAL_GetTick(); while (HAL_GetTick() - startTime < 5000) { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { if (strstr(InputMSG, answerSearch[i])) { resault = 1; break; } } }where I want to check if there are any match of answerSearch[i] within InputMSG array and if there is, jump out of while, but what I see is that the process lasts as long as 5000ms, even though the match is found. the thing is that even one match is enough and as soon as one match is found, I want it to jump out of while(). what can I do to make it jump as soon as it finds the first match?

..

Is there a FreeRTOS demo program, using STM32CubeMX to set up, for:STM3240G-EVAL - EVAL with STM32F407IG MCU orSTM32L476G-EVAL with STM32L476ZGT6 orSTM32F429IDISCOVERY with STM32F429ZIT6Any help appreciated I want to use STM32CubeMX to set upany of these eval boards, with FreeRTOS enabled, to create FreeRTOS code for testig 

HiCurrently we are using the STM32G071 MCU, but we will running out of flash memory soon, so we looking for an alternative. I've seen that a bigger G0x1 (STM32G0B1) will be available in the second half of this year. Are there more details available for the release date? Will it be in Q3 or Q4?Will the G0B1 be pin and feature compatible to the G071 (32Pin QFN Package)?Thanks\Marco

I am working on a biomedical research project to study how a head impact, such as in American Football, is transmitted through the brain.To make this work, I need to embed the smallest IMUs into a synthetic brain. The IMUs need to be able to measure angular motion at 1000-2000 deg/s (no problem) and also be able to measure linear acceleration in the 200 - 400 g range.After days of searching, I am unable to find any IMUs that meet this criteria.Does anyone have any ideas?? Thanks, John

Hi. I am planning to use TDA7498E in one of my projects and was going through the datasheet of the same and got confused at one point. In the absolute maximum ratings, it is written that the INPA, INNA, INPB, INNB have the maximum input rating of -0.3V to +4V.The thing which got me confused is that since the analog audio signal is more or less like a sine wave with equal peaks both in positive and negative, then how are we supposed to provide the input to the TDA7498E?

..

Now are available the Q&As of the February 23rd webinar on "IIS2ICLX (2021 CES Innovation Awards Honoree) inclinometer for angle measurement in Industry 4.0 and Smart City scenarios ranging from robotics to solar panel pointing applications, and even mention Structural Health Monitoring".You can find them on the MEMS&Sensors webinars group, marked by the topic "Industrial inclinometer webinar".Many thanks to ST colleagues @Pasi MYLLYMAKI​ and @Carlo LARGHI​ for their valuable contribution in reporting the webinar's Q&As for the world-wide MEMS&Sensors Community!

..

Documentation claims:The Font Converter accepts   TrueType (.ttf) OpenType (.otf) Glyph Bitmap Distribution Format (.bdf).I tried to use fonts from:https://github.com/farsil/ibmfontsI put fonts into folder: myproject\TouchGFX\assets\fontsAfter restarting TouchGFX, IBM fonts do not appear into Typography list.What is the problem?

Hello, I'm using stm32 tilebox (STEVAL-MKSBOX1V1 )for vibration analysis. I need to change the smapling frecuency. Where is the parameter to change it? I'm using the BLEsensors application of FP-SNS-STBOX1.Thanks

Hello, I am making a project with CR95HF on a custom PCB and I have been researching some information about the antenna for the transceiver operated by the early mentioned chip. I have couple questions to clear up your documentations for CR95HF and X-NUCLEO-NFC03A1.In the documentation AN5248, you mention in the calculation for EMI cut-off frequency that fc= 1 / 2*PI*sqrt[(2*L0) * (C0/2)] = 14.6 MHz, however my calculation brought me a result of fc = 15.04 MHz. What causes this almost 0.5 MHz jump?In the same document AN5248, you use this drawing of schematic part close to antenna: There you mention Low pass filter contains 2 capacitors, C01 and C02, that are equal in value. However in the schematic of X-NUCLEO-NFC03A1 (for example UM2479), there are 4 capacitors in parallel (C9, C10, C13 and C14).What is the difference between using 2 and 4 capacitors in the EMI filter. According to the fc formula, it should not change the cut-off frequency so I have been wondering what is the purpose

Hello, I bought a NUCLEO-L552ZE-Q and tried to connect with STLINK Utility . But STLINK Utility rejects.08:57:29 : ST-LINK SN : 066CFF505352716587121640 08:57:29 : V2J37M26 08:57:29 : Connected via SWD. 08:57:29 : SWD Frequency = 4,0 MHz. 08:57:29 : Connection mode : Connect Under Reset. 08:57:29 : Debug in Low Power mode enabled. 08:57:29 : Can not connect to the target! 08:57:33 : Unexpected errorI used the lastest ST-LINK Utility v4.6.0.0Connection other boards, like STM32F4 Disco or STM324R9 Disco worked fine. Therefore STLINK Utility is basicly workingAdditional strange is, that the NUCLEO-L552ZE-Q is working fine with CubeID. Programming and debugging is possible.Therefore, at the moment, only the combination NUCLEO-L552ZE-Q + ST-LINK Utility isn't working.I used the NUCLEO-L552ZE-Q out of the box. (No jumper modified)Any ideas ?

..

Hello everyone, I am using stm32cubemx to generate my project. In the ProjectManager/code generation option, I checked "Generate peripheral initialization as a pair of '.c/.h' files per peripheral". The reason was to turn main.c into main.cpp, so i wont have to manually add extern 'C' for all the generated initialzations. However, when I compile, it says that STMPE811 has undefined references to IOE. How should I fix this problem?Thanks in advance!