About

When attempting to reply or thumb-up while not logged in, a popup window appears which directs me to log in. However, the wording there is confusing to users:Why would I as user be concerned with “SSO” and “Saml2?”I recommend to remove “Login with SSO” and rename “Login with Saml2” in the button to mere “Login” or “Click here to log in”.JW

Please disable this restriction.  I don’t see how allowing everyone to download TouchGFX Designer can violate any regulation.

How can I edit my post after submitting? There's no edit option anymore?

When writing a reply, clicking Send does visually nothing until the thread reloads with the new post.This can take quite a couple of seconds, during which one wonders whether he did click Send properly or what’s going on.It would be nice if clicking Send would result in some immediate visual confirmation, before the actual reload.JW PS> I have no idea what “product area” nor “tags” would this post belong to, so I just clicked some random. Maybe “Other” could be added for such purposes?

Please fix Related topics list for Feedback forum. It is weird to see hardware topics while making topic in Feedback forum section.The same for tags 

I have suggestion. For example I can write post whole day. After about 10 hours while adding image/attachment I get strange msg “Yocto 5.0.webp: Something went wrong, please check your link and try again.” (where Yocto 5.0.webp is a name of my attachment) Perhaps this msg should be fixed to something like “Yocto 5.0.webp: Something went wrong, perhaps your session is expired. You should manually save all your progress and reload the page”

The old forum used to save drafts of replies.So, when this happened: You could try again - and not lose everything you typed.This worked whether it was a forum error, a network error, user error (closing the page before hitting ‘Send’) or whatever. We really need this feature back - I have just lost two posts!

Here:But the most recent post in that thread is 1 year old: I guess this is an old thread woken by spam, and the spam has now been deleted ?But the forum should not be highlighting it in the ‘Recent Activity’ list.

I met the same problem: my account was blocked with msg “You've been banned or your account has been deleted”. I am old member. My post was about stm32 products with links to github repo. Please unblock me. Please allow old member (with history) to challenge the blocking. For me not clear how to do it without another account.

Related but different topic:  I got a notification of a new post, but clicking on it didn’t bring me to the last post. I scrolled down to find the post and did not see it. I did ctrl+f to find the post by username and got the reply. It was very high in the thread. My beef is they are not chronological. But it’s also an issue that clicking on the notification did not take me to the post initially. I can’t reproduce that anymore.

In this thread:There is a PDF attached.On the old forum, attached PDFs could be viewed online - without having to download.I can’t see how to do that now - clicking, or right-clicking and choosing ‘open in new tab’ both just try to start a download.Am I missing something?

Should it ?I think the old forum did ?

Follow-on from: Generally, when a thread gets abandoned there may be some useful content in the replies - so it makes sense to keep the thread. But, if the thread is abandoned with no replies at all - is there any point in keeping it ?Examples:  (all now locked due to no activity for >1 year)

Here: In the ‘Best Answer’ shown at the top of the thread (immediately after the OP), it’s on a black background:  But, in its original position within the thread view, it’s on a grey background: Note also that the line spacing is different - so the “ASCII Art” no longer works properly

I have copied this link from the post “STM32CubeIDE 2.2.0 released”:https://community.st.com/stm32cubeide%2Dmcus%2D28/stm32cubeide%2D2%2D2%2D0%2Dreleased%2D166532?postid=166532#post166532 But that link actually goes to:Text of the URL (with the https prefix removed, to stop the forum linkifying it):community.st.com/stm32-mcus-embedded-software-32/how-to-send-int-values-efficiently-through-cdc-usb-39682?postid=166532#post166532Which does, in fact have the same ?postid=166532#post166532 as the other link!

Right now replies are shown reddit-style, not classic forum style. An newer reply can show up much higher in a topic than an older reply. I don’t think it makes sense in a forum like this as you won’t have many nested discussions (if it’s off topic a new topic will/should be created). I only click reply on a reply so I can quote it and respond to it. Not to create a deeper nesting.I’d like an option to disable it.I saw it when I clicked a notification in this topic and it didn’t bring me to the post. I scrolled down and didn’t see a new post.https://community.st.com/stm32cubeide%2Dmcus%2D28/date%2Dmacro%2Dexpansion%2Dincorrect%2Din%2Deditor%2D132651I had to use CTRL+F to find it. Though I cannot reproduce that issue anymore.

Gramar = Grammar. 😁I am currently studying the GPDMA peripheral in the STM32U5XX.I am trying to use a linked-list with 2D addressing to control an ILI9488 from the FMC, speeding refresh rates up further apart from fully using the GPU2D. I am running into some issues with the GPDMA, so I need to study it further.The comments were written by engineers, and they probably spent more time on the quality of good and reliable code than on writing the comments. I'm a bit like that myself, but I expected slightly better comments from ST.May I provide feedback on the text in the header of stm32u5xx_hal_dma_ex.c?I have corrected the spelling of that part and this can be used to improve these comments. No pun intended, but help offered.What’s the best way to do this? Posting it here, or better send some private email to the involved party? 

The old forum had a facility to report a User Profile; eg, an inappropriate avatar or username or for spamming.This was separate from reporting Posts.I don’t see that on the new forum ?  

The new forum seems to be wrapping lines within source code blocks; eg lines 44 & 45 here: This really messes with the layout - surely, it’s one of the things which a code block specifically should not do ?

Here:https://community.st.com/stm32-mcus-60/how-to-solve-debugger-connection-issues-172?tid=172&fid=60#:~:text=See%20Also%3A%C2%A0How%20to%20solve%20connection%20errors%20when%20connecting%20and%20programming%20the%20STM32%20target%20board.(why did the forum not automatically linkify that? I had to do it manually) The URL is:https://community.st.com/t5/stm32-mcus/how-to-solve-connection-errors-when-connecting-and-programming/tac-p/786977But that just goes to the community Home page. It should go to this post: PS:The next link in that post also fails in the same way:https://community.st.com/t5/stm32-mcus/faq-possible-communication-failure-between-stlink-v3-and-some/tac-p/736830 It should link to this: 

There are a lot of abandoned threads; eg,with no useful replies at all.That one is 2 years old, and still open for comments. Another:Also 2 years old, but that one is closed for comments.The final comment there looks like it is probably the solution, but no confirmation or other feedback from the OP. I think we needs a way to distinguish these abandoned threads from.They should probably be excluded from consideration as ‘Related topics’ - which is how I came across these 2. Not a new issue - it was the same on the old forum - and not urgent.But another for the “future enhancements” list … ? Related: 

I’m absolutely sure this post had an attachment, as ​@ChrisO  writes in that post.It appears to got lost during migration.Can ST please check.I wonder, whether this is related to the fact that the attachment was added not to the initial post of the thread, but later on in the thread. And of course the question arises, how many similar attachments got lost.Thanks,JW

Here: It says “2 Replies” - but there are actually three (one is hidden): Also in the Topic listing:  I said this “hiding” of replies would lead to confusion - it seems it’s even confusing the forum itself !