About CTapp.1

CTapp.1 · 2024-11-08

When I try to "Program and Run Target" I get the following in the log window: Compile make -f ../gcc/Makefile -j8 Reading TouchGFX/application.config Reading TouchGFX/target.config Compiling Core/Src/main.c Com...

CTapp.1 · 2024-11-07

The MX configuration reported (generated from within the STM32CubeIDE, if that makes a difference) only includes the settings for the Config Parameters, Include Parameters and Advanced Settings tabs, but there are many more (Tasks and Queues, Timers ...

CTapp.1 · 2024-11-07

Process Explorer is showing a number of TouchGFXDesigner processes as running even though all instances of it have been closed (there are no windows visible).I found this when I tried to delete and folder and that failed with an "in use" message - Re...

CTapp.1 · 2024-11-07

I've copied the folder containing a TouchGFX project for the STM32H7B3I-DK from one machine to another. However, I get the following error when I try to generate code on the new machine: Generate Assets make -f simulator/gcc/Makefile assets ...

CTapp.1 · 2024-10-17

I am currently working on testing of some code using a testing tool. As nearly all of the code interacts with the hardware, it is easiest for me to do this on the target. The tool automatically builds the test environment and allows files and/or func...

CTapp.1 · 2024-11-08

The report was generated using the CubeMX that is part of STM32CubeIDE 1.16.0.The reported generated from the attached .ioc allows the issue to be recreated.

CTapp.1 · 2024-11-08

Thanks - on further investigation, the project somehow has two Core folders and I was looking at the one that wasn't being used during the build!I am trying to move a project from one machine to another - the TouchGFX project opens (and upgrades) ok,...

CTapp.1 · 2024-11-08

I've upgraded to the latest Designer and the project is now generating correctly.

CTapp.1 · 2024-11-07

Thanks, I'll go grab the update...

CTapp.1 · 2024-10-18

Yes, that could also be done - but some coding standards would then consider the code to be "commented out", resulting in a standards violation that has to then be managed ;) It's in a user-provided code section, so it's easy enough to remove.

User statistics

User Activity

Building in Designer fails for a missing include that doesn't exist

Generated MX report does not include all FreeRTOS settings

Orphaned TouchGFXDesigner processes

TouchGFX project does not build after being moved to a new machine

Unit testing and system initialisation code

Re: Generated MX report does not include all FreeRTOS settings

Re: Building in Designer fails for a missing include that doesn't exist

Re: TouchGFX project does not build after being moved to a new machine

Re: Orphaned TouchGFXDesigner processes

Re: Unit testing and system initialisation code