STM32CubeMX HAL generated code for STM32F051 faulty

[tovis]

I'm using STM32CubeMX 6.14.1
Recently I was added DAC to my project. I doesn't suppose to use DAC with interrupt, I wasn't enable it, but occasionally I was enabled DAC callbacks.
Generated the code for Makefile based project.
In the end of building process, linker thrown errors:

/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/12.2.1/../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: build/stm32f0xx_hal_dac.o: in function `HAL_DAC_Init':
/home/tovis/nusi/worke/STM32/F051_ccl/Drivers/STM32F0xx_HAL_Driver/Src/stm32f0xx_hal_dac.c:304: undefined reference to `HAL_DACEx_ConvCpltCallbackCh2'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/12.2.1/../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: /home/tovis/nusi/worke/STM32/F051_ccl/Drivers/STM32F0xx_HAL_Driver/Src/stm32f0xx_hal_dac.c:304: undefined reference to `HAL_DACEx_ConvHalfCpltCallbackCh2'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/12.2.1/../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: /home/tovis/nusi/worke/STM32/F051_ccl/Drivers/STM32F0xx_HAL_Driver/Src/stm32f0xx_hal_dac.c:304: undefined reference to `HAL_DACEx_ErrorCallbackCh2'

I made some investigation, and turns out, that in generated code stm32f0xx_hal_dac.c DAC handled as it have two channel - STN32F051 have only one channel DAC. From the other side, where the callbacks are defined there is a series #ifdef and list of STM32F0xx MCUs which have two channel DAC (stm32f0xx_hal_dac_ex.c row: 1088). With this setup callbacks for the second channel aren't generated, what leads to linker error.

When I understand what's the problem, I simply disabled callbacks. My problem is solved, but I think it's a bug and sometime shall be corrected.

[STTwo-32]

Hello @tovis 

could you please upload your .ioc file.

Best Regards.

STTwo-32

[tovis]

Thank you for quick respond.
In the attached .ioc file the DAC callbacks are disabled.

To reproduce the problem, you should enable DAC callbacks.

[tovis]

I was re-enable DAC callbacks and the error is appear again.
The ioc file attached.

[Mahmoud Ben Romdhane]

Hello @tovis ,

First let me thank you for bringing this issue to our attention.

An internal ticket is submitted to the dedicated team (Ticket Number: 211008)

Thanks.

Mahmoud

[tovis]

Thank you and your dedicated team.
Other question, in such a situation what is the best solution?

Before I realize that i don't need callbacks, I was trying to make code useful, simply add my MCU to list where those callbacks are take a place (#ifdef) - code become linkable. But solution is dirty, left some inappropriate code in the result elf and bin.

The next approach, would be exclude inappropriate fields even from handle structure and initialization. More tedious and dangerous. Also, if I change the configuration and generate code I would correct the code again, may be use patch.

Is there a better approach?