2022-01-11 07:04 AM
Hi,
When I have a look at the AN5056(https://www.st.com/resource/en/application_note/dm00414677-integration-guide-for-the-xcubesbsfu-stm32cube-expansion-package-stmicroelectronics.pdf), there is a possibility on page 39 to improve the boot time. That is exactly what I want to achieve, but it seems, the code of the SBSFU changed over time and it looks not anymore as in the AN5056:
Now in the sfu_boot.c, there is much more code available and if I try to comment out as in the AN5056, I always get a critical handle failure:
How is it possible to improve the SBSFU boot time in the newest version?
2022-01-13 08:39 AM
Hi @STsch.1 ,
failing signature may mean that something is not generated with up-to date code. When making a change in the code, especially with all the security already enabled, you may need to rebuild everything, starting with the SEcore.
BR,
J
To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
2022-01-21 01:50 AM
Ok, it was indeed my mistake, I commented out too much code. Thank you.