Posted on March 30, 2017 at 21:52
[EDIT] PS. If you are relying on RCC_CR.MSIPLLEN , read it back to verify if it's really on, first.
They don't read back...... They call this
/* Enable MSI Auto-calibration through LSE */
HAL_RCCEx_EnableMSIPLLMode
();
That looks like THIS
/**
* @brief Enable the PLL-mode of the MSI.
* @note Prior to enable the PLL-mode of the MSI for automatic hardware
* calibration LSE oscillator is to be enabled with HAL_RCC_OscConfig().
(They did that)
* @
retval
None*/
void
HAL_RCCEx_EnableMSIPLLMode(
void
)
{
SET_BIT(RCC->
CR
, RCC_CR_MSIPLLEN) ;
}
Then they just motor onward through this
/* Select MSI output as USB clock source */
PeriphClkInitStruct.
PeriphClockSelection
= RCC_PERIPHCLK_USB;
PeriphClkInitStruct.
UsbClockSelection
= RCC_USBCLKSOURCE_MSI;
HAL_RCCEx_PeriphCLKConfig
(&PeriphClkInitStruct);
/* Select PLL as system clock source and configure the HCLK, PCLK1 and PCLK2
clocks dividers */
RCC_ClkInitStruct.
ClockType
= (RCC_CLOCKTYPE_SYSCLK | RCC_CLOCKTYPE_HCLK | RCC_CLOCKTYPE_PCLK1 | RCC_CLOCKTYPE_PCLK2);
RCC_ClkInitStruct.
SYSCLKSource
= RCC_SYSCLKSOURCE_PLLCLK;
RCC_ClkInitStruct.
AHBCLKDivider
= RCC_SYSCLK_DIV1;
RCC_ClkInitStruct.
APB1CLKDivider
= RCC_HCLK_DIV1;
RCC_ClkInitStruct.
APB2CLKDivider
= RCC_HCLK_DIV2;
if
(
HAL_RCC_ClockConfig
(&RCC_ClkInitStruct, FLASH_LATENCY_4) !=
HAL_OK
)
{
// Error_Handler();
}
[EDIT2] you have RCC_CCIPR.CLK48SEL set to 0b11, don't you
I seem to find it being READ and CHECKED, but just DEFINED here
#define
RCC_CCIPR_CLK48SEL_Pos (26U)
#define
RCC_CCIPR_CLK48SEL_Msk (0x3U << RCC_CCIPR_CLK48SEL_Pos)
/*!< 0x0C000000 */
#define
RCC_CCIPR_CLK48SEL RCC_CCIPR_CLK48SEL_Msk
#define
RCC_CCIPR_CLK48SEL_0 (0x1U << RCC_CCIPR_CLK48SEL_Pos)
/*!< 0x04000000 */
#define
RCC_CCIPR_CLK48SEL_1 (0x2U << RCC_CCIPR_CLK48SEL_Pos)
/*!< 0x08000000 */
It's their magic. Not mine. And I keep getting notified my post is being moderated. IF ST is looking over my shoulder - WHY NOT SPEAK UP?
Its pretty obvious I'm outside the intended example line here.
Posted on March 31, 2017 at 16:16
Thanks Jan.
Yeah I get it. If that's not really set, then we're drifty as an RC oscillator in the wind. Precisely! Theres 2 side to this however.
1. I need to see if there is a CODE problem and try fixing it. I might need a little help from ST.(If that is possible. Acts like I should be chasing a memory leak though on this one. But I do have 3 Hard fails and 7 working so thank goodness there is variety)
2. I need to leave their code AS IS and report the findings here so it can be examined by ST
Still no word on my critical TECH031634 online support request outside of the auto-generated email. And the following worries me. when I go to the Online Support, I see this
Note this is ALL ACTIVE ITEMS???. Maybe TECH031634 doesn't show up because there has been no initial response?
Still worrisome because it is certainly ACTIVE from MY standpoint. So since its making me think... Why isn't my new issue showing up? I just go fishing around by selecting the HUMAN BODY symbol upper right, then MY ACCOUNT, then ONLINE SUPPORT(RIGHT), The list of 4 items STILL doesn't show the TECH031634 However if I select SEE ALL on that page, THEN I can see the TECH031634 as ASSIGNED, plus ALL of the ones I've submitted. And ''ASSIGNED'' is possibly as official and efficient as a computer ASSIGNING it from a list of folks (Fred - next in line - lets say) and good old Fred is on a 3 week vacation right now.
If someone is really looking into it, is it too much to ask for just a simple HUMAN response to that effect.
I'll try to get to register dump trickery. But its Friday! Meetings occur today. The fate of this probably at the forfront.
And there will be those questions like '' we've successful nailed down thousands of the M3062xxxxxxxxx and those FT2xxxx for micro/USB before. Why are we trying to use these new things and the company won't even respond to you?''
I'm starting to run thin on clever ROCK SOLID words here.
But I AM bringing in a hair dryer.
Tighter tolerance crystals (10ppm) should be here today or tomorrow. All signs point to that as a good possibility ''tree'' to be ''barking up'' for now.
