cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

RTCAPBEN/RTCAPBLPEN incorrectly documented for 'F412/413/423

In both RM0402 Rev 6 and RM0430 Rev 8:

  • in RCC_APB1ENR subchapter, in the bits table, bit 10 is incorrectly named RTCAPB instead of RTCAPBEN
  • in the subsequent description of bit 10, it is 3x incorrectly named RTC APB
  • in the register map table at the end of the chapter, it is named correctly

and

  • in RCC_APB1LPENR subchapter, in the bits table, bit 10 is correctly named RTCAPBLPEN
  • in the subsequent description of bit 10, it is incorrectly named RTCAPBEN (missing LP)
  • in the register map table at the end of the chapter, this bit is missing entirely.

All of these are OK in RM0401 Rev 3.

Moreover, the default state for RTCAPBEN for both 'F412 and 'F413/423 is said to be 1, whereas for 'F410 is said to be 0. I don't have a 'F410 at hand to try - Is this correct?

JW

PS. In my naive expectation that ST cares about their customers, I'd love to hear a qualified explanation of this bit's existence in 'F410/'F412/'F413/'F423, in light of its absence in other STM32 families, especially 'F401/'F411.

2 REPLIES 2
Imen GH
ST Employee

Hello @Community member​ ,

I will check and get back to you.

Thank you

Imen

Thanks, Imen.

Jan