Microxplorer suggestions for improvement
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2013-10-02 1:05 AM
Maybe it
's
read by
developers from ST.
I
had
two
ideas for
improvements
-Somehow
graphically
distinguish
outputs that
are
5
volt
tolerant
- Add
user defined (
label)tag
in
which
the
user
can
observe
what
signal
is
connected
to the
pin.It
streamlines the
design and
should
be
added
export
in
jpg
etc
.,I could use
it
for
project documentation
#microxplorer- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2013-10-07 6:47 AM
I agree: it would be nice to to redefine the standard pin names with user names, e.g. the signal names used on the schematics. It's easy to then generate a table of correspondance in the program with #define. Thanks to the team for the nice tool, however.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2013-10-17 10:09 AM
I agree. A user defined label field for each pin would be very useful. I mentioned it to an ST rep quite a while back but probably got lost. They could use a feedback link somewhere in the Microxplorer section of the web site as I don't think they monitor these forums very closely.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2013-10-17 10:17 AM
I don't think they monitor these forums very closely.
Indeed, it's a user forum.Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2014-07-09 2:21 PM
But moderated and therefore should be monitored. STM32CubeMX has incorporated our suggestion of user names for the pins (not sure when but V4.3.0 has it). Nothing to indicate 5V tolerance that I can see yet.
