2019-08-16 04:23 AM
I am really confused that is it necessary or not. Because if I am going to the series STM32F030 these controller doesn't have in built EEPROM memory.
Solved! Go to Solution.
2019-08-16 06:28 AM
Perhaps you work with someone who has a better grasp of the project requirements and specific use cases?
If you have a value that is constantly changing, and must be remembered, I don't think FLASH is appropriate, at the very least it is not the best choice.
2019-08-16 04:28 AM
Perhaps look at using the L0 series parts instead.
2019-08-16 05:32 AM
My question is that could I used a controller without EEPROM for my application?
2019-08-16 06:28 AM
Perhaps you work with someone who has a better grasp of the project requirements and specific use cases?
If you have a value that is constantly changing, and must be remembered, I don't think FLASH is appropriate, at the very least it is not the best choice.
2019-08-16 06:48 AM
Yes as because it is energy meter so its value will be continuously change.
so you mean that EEPROM must be present to store values?
2019-08-16 07:39 AM
No, I'm saying that FLASH is perhaps the least suitable. Data could be journalled, and spread across multiple pages, to mitigate wear and failure.
Perhaps think about NVRAM (RTC/BKPRAM)
What design choices are driving the use of the F0 over the L0 parts?
2019-08-20 02:51 AM
As because of the cost reduction.
Thank you for the answer.