2021-11-22 11:21 PM
there is maybe a mistake at the page 99 in the RM0090 Reference manual document:
the bit area 12 is valid or not?
Solved! Go to Solution.
2021-11-23 05:31 AM
Bits 31:13 should be marked as reserved, instead of 31:11.
It is correct in 3.9.1 but incorrect in 3.9.2.
2021-11-23 01:54 AM
Hello @fang liang ,
Can you please describe clearly the issue with bit 12 ?
Why is that not valid ?
Imen
2021-11-23 03:18 AM
I guess it's because the range 31:11 is declared Reserved, but just below you have bit 12 and 11 shown as readable and/or writable.
bits 12 and 11 are in the range 31:11.
2021-11-23 03:19 AM
Should the reserved bits be 31:13 or should bits 12 and 11 be reserved?
2021-11-23 05:31 AM
Bits 31:13 should be marked as reserved, instead of 31:11.
It is correct in 3.9.1 but incorrect in 3.9.2.
2021-11-23 07:24 AM
The reserved bits should be Bits 31:13, as answered @TDK.
The typo is raised internally for correction in the coming release of the RM0090.
Thanks for your contribution.
Imen
2021-11-23 07:36 AM
thank you for all
2021-12-01 03:00 PM
Also the PM0059 has exactly the same error.