cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

How to get callback 'CDC_TransmitCplt_FS(.......)' invoked

FredS
Senior

Hallo everyone,

Before I encountered a bug in an USB_OTG_FS library function (see previous post), I struggled to find out when the function  'CDC_Transmit_FS(uint8_t* Buf, uint16_t Len)' has finished, meaning the content of the 'Buf' argument is completely transmitted.

After a thorough search through the various sources and the Reference manual RM068, I concluded the Register DOETMSK has a bit XFRCM that should fire an interrupt in case the the transmission has finished. I assume the common interrupt function ' HAL_PCD_IRQHandler(&hpcd_USB_OTG_FS)' will deduce that function 'CDC_TransmitCplt_FS(.......)' should be fired when the XFRCM creates an interrupt.

Despite my efforts I could not find a way to:

   a) find out if my assumptions above are complete and/or correct

   b) how to handle the registers for the USB_OTG_FS device. In the SWF column of the debugger I saw 4 groups of OTG registers, but never found a way to access them in my code. And the complexity of this device, together with an overwhelming amount of typedefinitions, structures and enums makes it very difficult to deduce the rules for Register access.

Can someone shed some light on these issues? I will appreciate any help.

Thanks in advance,

Fred Schimmel

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Hallo FBL,

After some time reading in the UM1734, I gave up. Maybe because of my age, maybe due to the lack of background knowledge, I could not wrap my head around the descriptions. The USB design is so complex and so the software to handle all scenarios, I got lost many times.

This conclusion, combined with not being able to connect to a PC, made me decide to return to an UART device for my project. I implemented it before, but then concluded the max. Baudrate of 115200 too low for my project. Now, after re-reading the RM0368 on UART baudrate, I will try to use this device with 7MB/s. I intend to report on my results.

Greetings,

Fred Schimmel

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
FBL
ST Employee

Hello @FredS 

Could you explain which bug? Is it about this thread ? Solved: Function body has content of opposite function - STMicroelectronics Community

CDC_TransmitCplt_FS is used to inform that submitted data is successfully sent over USB. Check UM1734_STM32Cube.book to learn more about upper layer for software

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

FredS
Senior

Hallo FBL,

I can understand your confusion and yes, these two help requests are related as originally they are both encountered in the same project.

The alleged cause of not be able to connect to a Windows COM port appeared to be a mistake on my side. The two functions look identical at first sight but are not, as Eddie pointed out before. However, the execution of the last statement in the function 'USB_DevConnect(......)' does appear to trigger the a failing attempt to create a VCP in Windows. This conclusion is the result of my last debugging of the test project I promised to report on. It shows my problem still exists and I realize in fact my question is now under the wrong subject.

On the second sentence of your reply: I am busy reading the UM1734 and will react when I have questions.

Thanks for your interest,

Fred Schimmel

 

 

Hallo FBL,

After some time reading in the UM1734, I gave up. Maybe because of my age, maybe due to the lack of background knowledge, I could not wrap my head around the descriptions. The USB design is so complex and so the software to handle all scenarios, I got lost many times.

This conclusion, combined with not being able to connect to a PC, made me decide to return to an UART device for my project. I implemented it before, but then concluded the max. Baudrate of 115200 too low for my project. Now, after re-reading the RM0368 on UART baudrate, I will try to use this device with 7MB/s. I intend to report on my results.

Greetings,

Fred Schimmel