cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

STM32H7 Nucleo-144 boards: erroneous STDC14 pin descriptions in UM2407

KasDev
Visitor

Title edited to clarify that STM32H7 Nucleo-144 boards is the subject.


Table 5 on Page 20 of UM2407 contains erroneous info on the STDC14 connector. I am very sure that the descriptions for STDC14 pins 8 and 12 are wrong, maybe others aswell.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
mƎALLEm
ST Employee

Hello,

I think how this it should be:

mALLEm_0-1766064077062.png

While pin 4 description is correct

Internal ticket for follow-up 224078.

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on "Accept as Solution" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

View solution in original post

8 REPLIES 8
mƎALLEm
ST Employee

Hello @KasDev and welcome to the  ST community,

So what errors you've detected in Table 5? please provide details.

Thank you

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on "Accept as Solution" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
Andrew Neil
Super User

So this:

AndrewNeil_0-1766059239853.png

Yes ?

So, as @mƎALLEm said, what do you think is wrong, and why?

 

PS:

It seems to match the STDC14 pinout shown in the STLink-V3SET manual:

AndrewNeil_0-1766059725389.png

https://www.st.com/resource/en/user_manual/um2448-stlinkv3set-debuggerprogrammer-for-stm8-and-stm32-stmicroelectronics.pdf#page=24

 

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.
A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.
KasDev
Visitor

According to the designation column, pin 6, 8 and 12 are targeting JTMS(T_JTMS), JTDO(T_JTMS) and JTMS(T_JTMS) respectively. As far as i know that is wrong, as you are not supposed to connect them all to T_JTMS and pin 12 needs to be connected to NRST for JTAG to be able to force reset during debugging to regain control of the MCU. I mean i know i could just follow the CN5 column of the table, but the designation column confused me alot.

Edit: when talking about pin numbers im looking at the pin numbers in the column stdc14.


@KasDev wrote:

According to the designation column, pin 6, 8 and 12 are targeting JTMS(T_JTMS), JTDO(T_JTMS) and JTMS(T_JTMS) respectively. .


8 & 12 are both T_JTMS, but 6 is T_JCLK:

AndrewNeil_1-1766063058074.png

So it does look like 8 is wrong?

Have you checked the schematic?

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.
A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.

A jumped in the columns, i meant 4, 8 and 12.

Have you checked the schematic?

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.
A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.
KasDev
Visitor

No, i just copied this from a colleagues schematic who claimed it worked in the past and moved on.

KasDev_1-1766063716973.png

Just wanted to give you a heads up.

mƎALLEm
ST Employee

Hello,

I think how this it should be:

mALLEm_0-1766064077062.png

While pin 4 description is correct

Internal ticket for follow-up 224078.

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on "Accept as Solution" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.