Hello, I use CubeMX 6.1.1 and Keil 5.33.0.0 I got error "Invalid ROM Table" when trying to flash the MCU. with Debug settings set to Under Reset / HW Reset

[Thomas LB]

By default the ST-Link Debugger setting Pack "Keil.STM32L0xx_DFP.2.1.0" is Enable and I got error "Invalid ROM Table" when trying to flash the MCU. But If I just Disable the checkbox Enable in the Pack tab in ST-link Debugger setting then the flashing is OK :)

I'm I doing something wrong or is this a bug ?

Thanks for help,

Thomas

[Thomas LB]

A more detailed log from another project when flashing (same conditions):

File    : C:\Keil_v5\ARM\PACK\Keil\STM32L0xx_DFP\2.1.0\Keil.STM32L0xx_DFP.pdsc 

Sequence  : DebugPortStop 

Context  : Item #2: <control if="DoDebugPortStop">

         Item #0: <block>::Line 3 

Expression : "v5\ARM\PACK\Keil\STM32L0xx_DFP\2.1.0\Keil.STM32L0xx_DFP.pdsc" 

E310    : Debug access failed - cannot write value 0x00000000 to DP register 0x08

Flash Load finished at 17:30:12

[Thomas LB]

Target is STM32L051K8tx, If you want to reproduce just generate code from this:

[Jaroslav BECKA]

Hi Thomas,

in Options for Target... under Debug -> Settings -> Pack,

make sure to uncheck "Enable".

This solved the problem for me.

Currently, I have no explanation for this behavior, likely a bug in Keil.

 

Best regards

Jaroslav

[Thomas LB]

Hello, is this some kind of joke?

More than one year to give me answer that I already gave in original post?

(BTW the bug is still there)

Regards,

Thomas

[Pavel A.]

@Thomas LB​ Have you asked Keil about this? One of advantages of choosing Keil is their fast and professional support.

[Jaroslav BECKA]

When I was replying in this thread, I didn't notice that the question is already one year old.

I came across this issue only today.

Don't you think it would make sense to report this issue to Keil, which is the actual toolchain provider?

[Thomas LB]

Sure, but to me it's ST<->Keil bug so I can help by providing contexte and workaround but I think it is ST job to talk to Keil to fix it. For the record at the time a case was opened (00124133), someone at ST (@Jocelyn RICARD​ ) did reproduce de bug but can't find explanation so the case was "escalated" and closed but never got news from it :\