I came across a problem exactly described by this erratum:
As you can imagine, this was "fun" to investigate.
You may ask, "But Jan, don't you know you should read the Errata first?". Problem is, this is ES for 'G0B1, whereas the problem was observed on an 'L431.
Now, this erratum was already present in rev.1 of the 'G0B1 ES, of Jan.2021. The 'L431 erratum is now in rev.7, of May 2022, and its previous revision was May 2021, yet there's no mention of this erratum there.
JW
PS. And, ST, please, leave the "modern feel and look" for your marketing material. We are engineers, you could perhaps show us some respect and give us normal seriously looking documents.
PS2. Attachment is not for the initial post, but for the 'F030 Nucleo experiment described below, as there are no attachments to individual posts #ditch_salesforce
