Does it belongs to STM32F070RBT?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2016-12-21 12:16 AM
Dear Sir,
Can you tell me HAL_MspInit(void) function belongs to which STM device ?
Doesnt it belongs to
stm32f7xx?
I have srearch in this document, but didnt find
UM1785 User manual
Description of STM32F0xx HAL and Low-layer drivers?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2016-12-21 12:58 AM
Doesnt it belongs to
stm32f7xx?
No.
It is shown as an element of
stm32f0xx_hal_msp.c
, thus is a function implemented in this file.Those tree elements are basically Eclipse -standard, and look alike in most Eclipse-based IDEs.
Perhaps your question contains a spelling mistake, and you meant
stm32f
0
7x. In this case, the answer would be yes.ST had been pretty consistent in this naming.
stm32fxxx
would include all F devices,stm32f0xx
all F0 devices (e.g. F03x, F05x, F07x, ...) andstm32f07x
all F07 family devices.The STM32F7 is a quite different animal ...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2016-12-21 02:11 AM
Dear Sir Avartar,
Nice to get you here again!
Thank you to clear my confusion.
Dont you think, I can use that mentioned manual.
Perhaps your question contains a spelling mistake, and you meant stm32f07x.
While searching in online, I got to know most of the people use
stm32f7xx
Take a look in this link,
http://www.tjaekel.com/eth/doxygen/group___s_p_i___exported___functions___group1.html
Again I am on a mad question, perhaps for my ignorance, )for your kind information I have stared using Ecilipse, gave up co-coox and mdk-keil, using just state, utility files)
Dont you think, something wrong in cubemx?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2016-12-21 04:07 AM
Dont you think, something wrong in cubemx?
I think not - at least not in this regard ... ;)
As mentioned earlier, Eclipse uses two 'tools':
- the compiler/linker to actually build the application
- the parser to 'assist' during editing
I know this yellow hints in your picture all-too-well. This is the parser who cannot (for what reason soever) find/resolve all includes. If it builds, there is no real issue with the code.
Please don't ask me how to get that parser thing right ...
I just like to postulate that the parser sometimes fails on #includes embraced with #if / #endif, or includes depending on #defines.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2016-12-21 05:47 PM
I think not - at least not in this regard ... ;)
Its confusing, if your selected peripheral from stm32cubemx would absent or exists on main.c ( if we do intentionally) somehow it could make such error.
Forsure , things should not be exists twice.
This is the parser who cannot (for what reason soever) find/resolve all includes. If it builds, there is no real issue with the code.
Do you mean considering parser is less important as priority should be given in
compiler/linker?
Please don't ask me how to get that parser thing right ..
.Lets avoid it as long as anybody could explain.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2016-12-21 11:02 PM
Do you mean considering parser is less important as priority should be given in
compiler/linker?
It would be great if it worked. I searched once for a remedy (on a proprietary, Eclipse/GCC based toolchain) and found nothing - at least not in an acceptable time frame. Thus I learned to ignore it.
Perhaps someone can tell you how to do it - not me.
I'm not even sure if an Eclipse-specific forum would be helpful ...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2016-12-22 12:24 AM
I'm not even sure if an Eclipse-specific forum would be helpful ..
Yes, that forum is often keep silence!