Bypass vs Crystal ceramic
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2017-07-04 6:47 AM
Hello Team,
As per STM32F769I-DISCO board schematic, I understood it should be Bypass clock source.
But default cube project gives selection as Crystal ceramic. Why it is ceramic crystal?
Request you to help me which one I should select for STM32 -DISCO board?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2022-08-26 10:57 AM
Since NZ2520SB is not a ''Crystal/Ceramic Resonator'', but rather a crystal oscillator, you should use "BYPASS Clock Source" as the high speed clock option in CubeIDE/CubeMx.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2017-07-04 10:04 AM
To stop OSC_OUT banging up and down, BYPASS would generally be the desirable choice. The system is going to clock if OSC_IN delivers a pulse train meeting the input requirements.
Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2022-08-26 10:57 AM
Since NZ2520SB is not a ''Crystal/Ceramic Resonator'', but rather a crystal oscillator, you should use "BYPASS Clock Source" as the high speed clock option in CubeIDE/CubeMx.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2022-08-26 11:42 AM
Correct
BYPASS should have different input characteristics, and also not output a signal on OSC-OUT
Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
