I'm working on a Motor Control Project built with MCSDK(6.3.1).
After initial creation of the CubeMX ioc File by the MC-Workbench, a lot of additional configuration were manually made using CubeMX (~30 additional pins and their config, additional timers, etc.).
Then the Source Code was generated.
But when i now need to change parameters/configuration in the MC-Workbench and re-generate the ioc File, all the previously manually added config is lost and must be redone again which is a lot of work and prone to errors which are hard to detect.
Is this the intended workflow? Maybe i'm doing something wrong?
The workflow shown here: https://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/ecosystems/stm32-motor-control-ecosystem.html
shows a feedback cycle starting again at step 4 but i need to cycle to step 3 without loosing information in the ioc.
In the meantime i use a clean ioc without modifications and look at the diff made by changes by the MC-Workbench.
Then i manually apply the diff in the ioc to the working ioc with all the manual changes by CubeMX.
