You can't add anything elaborate if you don't know *why* and *from where* was the function called.
As I've said many times already, I wouldn't care what Cube is and does. Folks will always have opinions on software, regardless of how good or bad it may be; and that's inevitable, as everybody sees it from a different standpoint. I would simply ignore the existence of Cube (and I mostly do), wouldn't ST's policy be that Cube is the sole source of examples (i.e. I have to crack it in order to understand some details which are not properly documented in the manuals); and also I am concerned about the fact that all the money (which they have from selling chips, i.e. it's also my money) ST puts on examples goes onto Cube, instead of proper documentation and proper examples.
JW
