cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Why do I have to send a UART bootloader command twice to get an answer ?

Zephyr S
Associate II

Hello,

I am using a STM32L432KC to control the UART bootloader of a STM32F446RE.

First, I am sending Get and Get ID command to check if I get the recquired answer. It works, but not as I wish.

To begin I Initialize the bootloader sending 0x7F and that works too.

What I don't understand is why do I have to send the command twice to get an answer. It's the case for the 0x7F as well as for the get and Get ID. The first request never works, but all the following does.

Example :

Me : 0x7F

Res : Anything.. (not specially 1F)

Me : 0x7F

Res : 0x79

Me : 0xFD & 0x02

Res : 1F

Me : 0xFD & 0x02

Res : 79 01 04 21 79

Me : 0xFD & 0x02

Res : 79 01 04 21 79

Me : 0xFD & 0x02

Res : 79 01 04 21 79

...

It's exactly the same for the Get command...

I don't know if it's a normal situation or not, but I don't think it is really ergonomic..

Maybe someone could explain me, thus I could improve my program to overcome that.

Thanks in advance for your answer.

Regards

5 REPLIES 5
Uwe Bonnes
Principal III

Shouldn't you send  0x00+0xFF? until you see ack as start. Have a look ar AN3155.

Zephyr S
Associate II

That's what I should send concerning Get command.

Then I don't understand why neither,but if I send 0x00+0xFF it doesn't work, I have to send 0xFF+0x00... Exactly the same thing for the GetID command, I have to send 0xFD+0x02 (not 0x02+0xFD).

As it works this way, I d'ont think that's a pretty big deal.

TDK
Guru

Looks to be an error in your reception. The bootloader is responding correctly to what you're sending, but you're not interpreting the response until a byte late. It's using the second byte of 02 FD and the first byte of the next 02 FD to respond to. Use a different command back to back and it will no longer work.

--> 0x7F

0x79

--> 0x7F 0xFD

0x1F

--> 0x02 0xFD

79 01 04 21 79

etc...

Put a logic analyzer on the line to see exactly what's happening.

If you feel a post has answered your question, please click "Accept as Solution".
Zephyr S
Associate II

I don't think so because as I told you, I have to send twice the init command (0x7F) too which is built by only one byte.

The system can't take one byte from the first request and one from the second as it's the same byte in both and the system only need one of them, not both.

Look at the Rx/Tx lines using oscilloscope.

Do you have a pullup on mcu's Tx?

JW