No question, just an observation. In App Note 2606, the latest rev 37 dated 6 May 2019... for the STM32F412xx, Table 3 shows the bootloader ID as 0x91, but in Table 126 it is shown as 0x90.
I also found another error after transcribing all those data tables into a header file, but turned out I was using an outdated App Note from 2017. This is the only remaining error that hasn't been corrected (that I noticed). Sure would be nice if this information is available in machine-readable format like a header file, CSV, or something similar (it may be, and I just don't know about it).
