2018-10-16 01:08 AM
Hello,
I found a problem in eDesignSuite when i try to use STNRGPF01 (PFC boost interleaved IC).
At input current sensing the ICS Target Voltage is 3.00V and in the datasheet the ICS Target Vltage looks like it is 1.25V (also in the Help section of eDesignSuite). Which one is correct?
Also, is there any other datasheet (maybe we need to sign an NDA for it or smth like that) because the one on the site is very poor.
Best regards,
Mihai I.
Solved! Go to Solution.
2018-10-22 07:00 AM
Hi Mihai,
In short 1.25V are a limitation on inside comparator present in this family products, as specified in pag 32 (table 14) of datasheet (https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/stnrgpf01.pdf)
So every time user have necessity to compare a signal using internal comparator, the pin should have following range 0-1,25Volts.
This is the golden rule, in solution proposed, applied on
- Input Voltage Sensing Circuit,
- Output Voltage Sensing Circuit,
- Output Current Sensing Circuit,
where output go directly to a STNRGPF01's pin for comparision.
On the contrary on Input Current Sensing Circuit, the output of this module is a input for PI regulator so only in this case we can use a different target voltage according to the IC used in the Current Control Loop (https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/lmv321.pdf).
The two resistors R58 and R62, between PI's output and OUT_PIN, give a scale factor of 0.635 that ensure the correct voltage on OUT_PIN pin.
For further information on the proposed solution, it is also possible to refer to the following link, which shows a case of real use for STNRGPF01.
I hope my answer has been exhaustive.
Regards.
Carmelo.
2018-10-17 08:12 AM
Hi Mihai,
Thank you for your interest in ST Portofolio.
About your question.
The information on the "Help" is older and refers to the first version of the proposed solution, so please refer to the information in the ICS wizard.
Thank you for reporting, we will update this information on the next version, which should be released by 2018.
If you have specific questions or concerns, you can use the ST community for assistance.
Regards.
Carmelo
2018-10-22 05:19 AM
Hello @Carmelo VICCICA
Thanks a bunch for your answer! It is the first time i get an answer about problems regarding that IC..
What about the datasheet? There is written 1.25V max for this type of input.
The datasheet is also wrong?
Best regards,
Mihai
2018-10-22 07:00 AM
Hi Mihai,
In short 1.25V are a limitation on inside comparator present in this family products, as specified in pag 32 (table 14) of datasheet (https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/stnrgpf01.pdf)
So every time user have necessity to compare a signal using internal comparator, the pin should have following range 0-1,25Volts.
This is the golden rule, in solution proposed, applied on
- Input Voltage Sensing Circuit,
- Output Voltage Sensing Circuit,
- Output Current Sensing Circuit,
where output go directly to a STNRGPF01's pin for comparision.
On the contrary on Input Current Sensing Circuit, the output of this module is a input for PI regulator so only in this case we can use a different target voltage according to the IC used in the Current Control Loop (https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/lmv321.pdf).
The two resistors R58 and R62, between PI's output and OUT_PIN, give a scale factor of 0.635 that ensure the correct voltage on OUT_PIN pin.
For further information on the proposed solution, it is also possible to refer to the following link, which shows a case of real use for STNRGPF01.
I hope my answer has been exhaustive.
Regards.
Carmelo.
2018-10-24 10:12 PM
Hello @Carmelo VICCICA .
You're right, i don't know how i did missed that. Thank you very much!
But i got a few more questions, if you are kind enough to help me:
Thanks for your time and best regards,
Mihai I.
2018-10-29 07:55 AM
Hi Mihai,
Thanks for your questions, I will try to answer them.
About first question on ICS circuit:
The maximum peak current on R144 is calculate by following formulas
Ipeak = Irms * Math.sqrt(2) ( 1 + ripple/n) * margin
where :
with previous formula Ipeak is always 1,83 x Irms
About second question on Maximum Output Voltage:
In Interleaved PFC Specification in Output Section you find
About "Help" on Maximum Voltage a review will be done in the future release
About third question on R[x] Pin:
datasheet is wrong. it will be updated in the future release.
We apologize for inaccurate documentation and will try to update it with the next version of the product that will be released shortly.
Best Regards.
Carmelo Viccica
2018-10-31 10:40 AM
Hello @Carmelo VICCICA,
Thanks a lot for your answer, for the second and third questions i understood. For the first one i understood what is the formula but it doesn't make much sense. Anyway, i will use it as it is, and will come back with much more details after the first prototype testing.
I got another question (i will use your link - https://www.st.com/resource/en/data_brief/steval-ipfc01v1.pdf for the schematic).
In the 4th page, where is the comparator circuit (U304) your negative input is ~ VDD(5V)*10k/(10k+3k3) = 3.75V. The input of the comparator is maximum 1.25V(-0.3 or -0.4 from the diode) so how it can ever switch?
On the design suite, the resistor divider it is correct.
So, you have RocpL/(RocpL+RocpH) x VDD => 5*1.8/11.8 = 0.70V - that's correct.
So, i guess your board kit has a mistake?
Best regards,
Mihai
2018-11-06 07:25 AM
Hello,
@Carmelo VICCICA
Any update? I am almost in the final design phase and this is a major problem.
Best regards,
Mihai
2018-11-06 08:27 AM
Hi Mihai,
We apologize for the delay in the reply, but we are engaged in other projects.
The documentation present in website refers to STEVAL-IPFC01V1 where all OP Amplifier are supplied with 5V, so the input of U304 will be have a range from [0 - 4,7V].
eDesignSuite refers to a previous version of board where all OP Amplifier are supplied with 3V (EVAL-IPFC01V1).
In the future eDesignSuite will be updated to match with actual documentation of STEVAL-IPFC01V1.
Both designs are correct according to supply voltage selected for IC.
Best Regards.
Carmelo Viccica
2018-11-06 08:56 AM
Hello,
Sorry to bother, but i am in almost the final stage of the first iteration of the PFC using your IC and i my only ST support right now it is this forum (actually, you) because the datasheet has very little information about anything...
Ok, now that makes sense.
Thanks a bunch and best regards,
Mihai