About Aurelius

Aurelius · 2024-01-24

Hi,We have an issue with a production build of a VL53L1X based design. The VL53L1X is interfaced to a PIC18F micro, I have inherited the codebase and hardware. The initial production run was for 500 units, of these approx 260 passed our production te...

Aurelius · 2024-01-27

Thanks John,That's not good news for us, but at least we know where we are. I appreciate all the help.

Aurelius · 2024-01-26

Hi John,As mentioned before, I'm 1000% sure this issue has nothing to do with cover glass. We have hundreds of these units and enclosures (with cover glass), no matter how we pair them up... the bad sensors are always bad and the good sensors are alw...

Aurelius · 2024-01-26

Use a camera to verify (but NOT an Iphone - the IR filter is too good.) Check the relative brightness of the laser flash. I found something interesting here, on the good sensors I can clearly see the laser flash when using an Android camera (you are ...

Aurelius · 2024-01-26

Hi Guys,Thanks for the fast responses.I really don't think this is a cover glass issue, I have already tried 2 samples from the "good" and "bad" batch with each of the following tests, with and without calibration.- No baffle or glass.- Baffle withou...

Aurelius · 2024-01-25

Hi John,Unfortunately I don’t think it’s related to cover glass. The good / bad divide remains the same regardless of whether we have the cover glass fitted or not. All the tests above were actually completed with no cover glass, just a small baffle....

User statistics

User Activity

VL53L1X Distance Sensor 50% failure rate (erratic measurements).

Re: VL53L1X Distance Sensor 50% failure rate (erratic measurements).

Re: VL53L1X Distance Sensor 50% failure rate (erratic measurements).

Re: VL53L1X Distance Sensor 50% failure rate (erratic measurements).

Re: VL53L1X Distance Sensor 50% failure rate (erratic measurements).

Re: VL53L1X Distance Sensor 50% failure rate (erratic measurements).