Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:37If we knew, we couldn't tell because the company hasn't announced the details of the new product offering yet. However, it is the nature of the business to increase performance on newer product offerings. Especially wh...
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:34''Outperform'' was a poor choice of words on my part. Tests show that the Keil CARM compiler has a smaller code size when full printf libraries are included. In this particular test, speed was not measured. The benchma...
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:34The Keil compiler used in these benchmarks was the CARM compiler. As can be seen, it was outperformed by the other compilers in most tests (with the exception of the full ''printf'' tests). However, Keil was bought by ...
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:34I've found these benchmarks comparing various compilers including GCC. These benchmarks are several years old and compare the Normal and Thumb mode of an ARM7 core instead of the Thumb2 mode of a Cortex. I would expect...
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:33If you didn't like the LTC1661 because of setting time (30uS), then you are going to be real disappointed with the MAX5533 (660uS). :-[ Of course, the DAC in the micro has a setting time of 3-4uS. But package size and ...
