cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Why contains STM32F1_Med_density_LQFP48.bsd pin numbers above 48?

MScho.12
Associate

Hello.

I think version 2.0 of STM32F1_Med_density_LQFP48.bsd is wrong, since it contains pins above 48 (e.g. BOOT0: 60, JTDI: 50). On further inspection, its contents are equal to STM32F1_Med_density_LQFP64.bsd.

Unfortunately, STM32F1_Low_Med_density_value_LQFP48.bsd, which seem to be better suited, has a different IDCODE part number than my STM32F103C8T6

Since nobody reacted, here the part of the file I am referring to.

-- ****************** (C) COPYRIGHT 2015 STMicroelectronics **************************
-- * File Name          : STM32F1_Med_density_LQFP48.bsd                             *
-- * Author             : STMicroelectronics www.st.com                              *
-- * Version            : V2.0                                                       *
-- * Date               : 01-September-2015                                          *
-- * Description        : Boundary Scan Description Language (BSDL) file for the     *
-- *                      STM32F1_Med_density_LQFP48 Microcontroller.                *
[...]
     constant LQFP48_PACKAGE: PIN_MAP_STRING := 
          "BOOT0               : 60," & 
          "JTDI         : 50," & 
          "JTMS                : 46," & 
          "JTCK         : 49," & 
          "JTRST               : 56," & 
          "JTDO         : 55," & 
[...]
          "PB5          : 57," &
          "PB6          : 58," &
          "PB7          : 59," &
          "PB8          : 61," &
          "PB9          : 62," &
[...]
          "VDD          : (32, 48, 64, 19)," &
          "VSS          : (31, 47, 63, 18)" ;

0 REPLIES 0