cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

uClinux on STM3210E-Eval + STM32F103ZE

christopher23
Associate II
Posted on October 20, 2010 at 11:49

uClinux on STM3210E-Eval + STM32F103ZE

14 REPLIES 14
christopher23
Associate II
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 14:11

maybe it is relevant that i dont want(try) to use the NOR-flash version. i try to run the mcu-flash (internal flash) version.

some minutes ago i tried the first time the NOR-flash version and until now everything seems to be fine.

so can i expect that there are two possible problems:

1. damaged internal flash

2. damaged sourcefiles or compiler or image

??

the least thing i could expect is that uclinux , against the guide, could not be run from internal flash memory.

in the case, that it run perfectly from external flash, i think that something written in the guide is completly wrong refering to the problems i desribed above.

am i right when i say that, its not possible to run uclinux in a stable way from internal flash?

it would be nice if someone from st would say something to that.

thanks

christopher23
Associate II
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 14:11

nobody had an idea to this?

xacc
Associate II
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 14:11

I tried getting it running on my clone board last weekend but failed :(

I could not even get it started...

Will try again this weekend 🙂

christopher23
Associate II
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 14:11

i solved the problem ''myself''.

after i tried running uclinux out of external flash and everything was fine i checked another board. and see - everything is fine.

so question is answered at first.

thanks

xacc
Associate II
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 14:11

So it was a hardware issue?

Last night I finally manage to recompile everything for my board.

It starts, but due to my limited memory (512KB only) I immediately get a memory allocation failure when it tries to run linuxrc.

Now to figure out how to tune this for better memory usage.