2011-12-08 10:34 AM
From their respective RMs:
STM32F1... 0x4002 2000 - 0x4002 23FF Flash memory interface STM32F4... 0x4002 2000 - 0x4002 23FF GPIOI Thus a project predicated on STM32x compatibility must have at least different I/O base addresses based on processor type. Damn! I guess I have to say it again, “substantial compatibility� or in ST’s case, “compatible�, means incompatible. Now I have to go through, identify all the differences and come up with a way to select the proper include files. Does anyone know if the (possibly subset of) I/O offset address are always the same?2011-12-12 09:27 PM
If you compile a list, please post.
2011-12-13 12:02 PM
http://www.utasker.com/docs/STM32/uTaskerV1.4_STM32_Developers_Document.pdf
Regards Mark2011-12-13 05:08 PM
Thanks!
I created this article a couple weeks ago. I still need to add a big overview section, expand STM32 F1, add STM32 W, add some photos. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STM32 I started overhauling this article last weekend. It still needs a lot of work. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_Cortex-M I need to spend some time to examine uTasker. I looked at it briefly when expanding these articles. Steve2011-12-14 07:41 AM
Here is another free RTOS