Posted on May 17, 2011 at 12:24The following might be obvious to ARM processor experts, but I thought I would mention it to hopefully save others from the same mistake I made. (Note: The current measurements mentioned below are only for comparison purposes, the values might be different on later versions of the chip and with different hardware and test instruments.)
Be careful using the infinite loop ''while (1) ;''. I was moving this statement around my program so I could stop the program and measure the current at various stages of hardware initialisation - however I was getting wildly fluctuating current measurements.
The statement ''while (1);'' compiles to the assembler branch (b) statement:
''address: b address''
It appears that this branch statement uses different amounts of current, depending on the address of the branch (something to do with prefetches).
For example, if running from FLASH, 3V 2MHz, the current consumption I measured was:
For address= 0XXXXXXX0h, ..X2h, X8h, XAh => 0.9 mA
For address= 0XXXXXXX4h, ..X6h, XCh, XEh => 3.0 mA
From my tests, the first figure represents the minimum power consumption possible from a piece of assembler - and the second figure represents the maximum. In other words, the same loop structure represents both the best and worst power consumption, depending on where it is placed.
In general, the current consumption varies significantly depending on the type of code executed (it would be interesting to know what code ST used to determine its typical current consumption).
So if you have to use software delays loops, (sometimes it's simpler than using SLEEP or STOP), avoid a small loop such as:
''address: subs r0, r0, #1 ''
'' bne address ''
this loop uses 2.7mA. A larger loop which reads an IO port many times before branching uses much less power - eg. 1.2mA.
Greg.
