mx configuration report
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2017-05-13 12:48 AM
A minor bug in STM32CubeMX 4.21.0 (Win7, Adobe Reader 2017):
pin names don't fit in generated report PDF when 'locating stake' for user label is used. See attached screenshot
Solved! Go to Solution.
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2018-01-16 5:15 AM
Hello
Novak.Tamas
,
I see your point.
However, it is a choice that we made not to have the fit in for the pin name that is the best solution, on my point of view.
Or else, we would have some pins larger than the other...The pinout view would be a mess.
For the moment, it is not planned to change the pinout view.
BR. Jeanne
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2017-05-15 1:56 AM
Hi,
Could you please attach your .ioc file? I will highlight this issue internally to our CubeMx team.
Thanks
Imen
Thanks
Imen
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2017-05-15 9:01 AM
Here I attach the .ioc.
It happens also on-screen in CubeMX at low zoom levels. It seems this 'low-zoom view' is stored into pdf. It may depend also on system font and graphics driver.
________________ Attachments : H512.ioc.zip : https://st--c.eu10.content.force.com/sfc/dist/version/download/?oid=00Db0000000YtG6&ids=0680X000006HydY&d=%2Fa%2F0X0000000bAf%2FsXNhm3zLZttT6dbNgogPlJibpnfZv4So954k3WmAJcU&asPdf=false- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2017-05-16 4:39 AM
It's nothing to do with
'locating stake': it happens at standard pins as well. The graphical representation of a pin is too small to fit pin names especially long (e.g. 'PC15-OSC32_OUT') names.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2018-01-16 5:15 AM
Hello
Novak.Tamas
,
I see your point.
However, it is a choice that we made not to have the fit in for the pin name that is the best solution, on my point of view.
Or else, we would have some pins larger than the other...The pinout view would be a mess.
For the moment, it is not planned to change the pinout view.
BR. Jeanne
