2023-01-21 06:28 AM
Hello all...
Can someone give me direct answers below...(And please don't refer me to documentation as I have scoured thru it and not solved my questions)
I would like some clarity as I have found no documentation to clarify the following:
ST documentation is very poor with respect to labeling and consistency. They could do a whole bunch better if they stuck with using the register names and bit field names throughout their documentation especially on figures......
Sincerely
2023-01-23 02:29 AM
I think your questions are not basic, but instead relate to advanced features of the timers. And it wouldn't surprise me if none of the HAL examples cover such advanced features. I'm disappointed no-one who uses these features has chipped in; in the absence of anything better I'll give my thoughts.
I find the Reference Manual RM0351 the best we have, and I'm grateful for it. There are areas where it isn't clear, and only then do I reach for examples or experimentation.
Hope this helps,
Danish
2023-01-23 06:18 AM
Thank you for your response....As a HW engineer I want to know all the nuances of how this operates bcz many times that helps me make decisions on which processors to use for a given design job. I am coming from a TI background and those are extreme low power devices where you need to know all the details and code is written, many times, as bare metal to "eek" out the lowest energy. I feel most ppl who use STM are happy with the HAL stuff and don't require to understand the low level detailed operation as their application can get away with drawing a few more mA's here and there....As a newbie to this architecture I rely heavily on the details of the manuals and it is very frustrating to have inconsistent information in these documents. I wish documentation was tighter.....
PS.....Trust me I have been doing much experimentation :)