cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

STM32G0B1CET6N Eval Board.

Heena
Associate

Hello,

 

We have been using this Processor for very long time in our 2 project stream.

We are planning to use this part again, but for application suitability we need to verify this product as per our requirement.

So, i wanted to ask is there any Evaluation board available for this part, STM32G0B1CET6N

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

As always, go to the Product Page, and look on the 'Tools & Software' tab - there you will find available boards listed:

https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32g0b1ce.html#tools-software

 

But this is strange:

 


@Heena wrote:

We have been using this Processor for very long time in our 2 project stream.


If you've already been using it for "a very long time" - why do you need to "verify" it now?

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.
A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
mƎALLEm
ST Employee

Hello,

You can use STM32CubeMx and select Access to the board:

mALLEm_0-1744629833461.png

And type "STM32G0":

These are the available boards for G0 product:

mALLEm_2-1744629911611.png

mALLEm_3-1744629952465.png

So No EVAL board available for this exact part number but only Nucleo board:

mALLEm_4-1744630022629.png

 STM32G0B1CE is a 48pin package while the Nucleo board is a 64 pin package. You can use it and adapt it later to your application. Both part numbers yours and on the on eon the Nucleo board have 512kB of flash.

Hope that helps.

 

 

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on "Accept as Solution" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

As always, go to the Product Page, and look on the 'Tools & Software' tab - there you will find available boards listed:

https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32g0b1ce.html#tools-software

 

But this is strange:

 


@Heena wrote:

We have been using this Processor for very long time in our 2 project stream.


If you've already been using it for "a very long time" - why do you need to "verify" it now?

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.
A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.