2019-10-04 12:28 AM
Hi, I am currently implementing software/firmware for the PowerSTEP01 chip and discovered a inconsistency in data sheet https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/powerstep01.pdf. For parameter INT_SPEED (section 11.1.11 in datasheet) the equation does correspond to the stated limits.
It says:
i.e. steps/s = INT_SPEED × (2^−18) ÷ (250×10^−9)
steps/s = 1 × (2^−18) ÷ (250×10^−9) = 15.25
step/s = (2^(14+1)−1) × (2^−18) ÷ (250×10^−9) = 499984.74
But according to datasheet equation results should be in range 0 < steps/s < 976.5.
So what is correct?
NOTE: This question and answer originated from a customer support case which was handled by us. We regularly review support cases and add any helpful ones here for all to benefit from.
Solved! Go to Solution.
2019-10-04 12:32 AM
You are right, thank you for raising this issue. In fact, there is a typo in datasheet. The correct formula is:
i.e. steps/s = INT_SPEED × (2^−26) ÷ (250×10^−9)
Same mistake applies also to L6480 datasheet :persevering_face: , but at least L6470 datasheet is correct :) . Control logic is the same for all 3 devices.
Mistake in datasheet will be corrected asap. Sorry for the inconvenience.
2019-10-04 12:32 AM
You are right, thank you for raising this issue. In fact, there is a typo in datasheet. The correct formula is:
i.e. steps/s = INT_SPEED × (2^−26) ÷ (250×10^−9)
Same mistake applies also to L6480 datasheet :persevering_face: , but at least L6470 datasheet is correct :) . Control logic is the same for all 3 devices.
Mistake in datasheet will be corrected asap. Sorry for the inconvenience.
2022-02-15 06:02 AM
I have just downloaded the 'latest' datasheet and this change has not been implemented
2024-09-23 06:44 AM
I second MHall.4,
ST, we'd like more clarity on this. A datasheet revision would be very nice.
2024-11-04 01:49 AM
finally you can download the last datasheet revision of powerSTEP01;)