2020-06-03 08:54 AM
I am looking for "cavity"-type pressure sensors like the LPS27 or LPS33 but I am having a hard time finding out what the differences between the models are. For the stm32f series the online documentation includes a great comparison chart of the different models and I was expecting to find something similar for the pressure sensors.
So far I got:
The price (digikey) for LPS27 and LPS33K is similar, the LPS33HW is a bit cheaper and LPS33W is the cheapest.
Whats the point of the LPS33K, the LPS27 is smaller and better and costs the same?
Are LPS33HW and *W just "budged" options or do they offer any benefits that I missed?
Knowing the naming intentions behind "K", "W", "H" and "HH" would probably help understand the differences better. Is that information somewhere available?
Best regards
2020-06-05 07:44 AM
Hi @JHenn.1 , you can refer to the pressure sensor product selector on corporate st.com website, where all the details are listed.
>> Whats the point of the LPS33K, the LPS27 is smaller and better and costs the same?
Thanks to its potted gel package (more expensive), the LPS33K device has a high overpressure capability: 20x full scale.
>> Are LPS33HW and *W just "budged" options or do they offer any benefits that I missed?
They differ from the package.
>> Knowing the naming intentions behind "K", "W", "H" and "HH" would probably help understand the differences better. Is that information somewhere available?
I suggest you to check the Quick reference guide, where the meaning of the part number letters are described (H = high performance, W = "waterproof").
you can btw also download the ST Sensors Finder app from your smartphone store and select the application (and the related sensor) that best fits your need
Regards
2020-06-05 09:11 AM
Thank you for your reply.
About the potted gel package: the datasheets show that all sensors (LPS27and LPS33W/HW/K) have a potted gel package. All LPS33 (K,W and HW) are rated to 20x overpressure capability. So I guess the difference is that the LPS27 also has a potted gel package, but a different one that is less protective.
I still would really like to understand the intention behind using a CCLGA4 package for the LPS33K. The sensor has the exactly same physical size as the LPS33W/HW but uses less pins which removes the option to use SPI.